From 238ec2b7cc1557d6f34c33cc482e4d0cd3e266dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krinitsin Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 16:43:19 +0000 Subject: add results --- .../classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/885 | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 100644 results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/885 (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/885') diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/885 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/885 new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bd0ae740 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:32b/reasoning/syscall/885 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ + +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU into one of three categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. Let's break it down step by step. + +The bug report mentions that when using `getsockopt` on `SO_RCVTIMEO_NEW` and `SO_SNDTIMEO_NEW`, an unexpected `int` is written. I remember that `getsockopt` is a system call used in socket programming to get various socket options. So this seems related to how the system handles these specific socket options. + +Looking at the categories: +- "instruction" would relate to issues with specific CPU instructions, which doesn't seem relevant here. +- "syscall" deals with errors occurring during system calls, which fits because `getsockopt` is a syscall and there's an issue with it. +- "runtime" covers other runtime errors, but since this specifically mentions a syscall, it's more precise. + +So the bug is likely related to how QEMU handles these socket options via syscalls. Therefore, the category should be 'syscall'. + + +The bug involves issues with system calls (`getsockopt`), so the appropriate category is: + +**syscall** + +Answer: +syscall \ No newline at end of file -- cgit 1.4.1