semantic: 0.206 other: 0.195 device: 0.095 PID: 0.057 debug: 0.057 socket: 0.053 vnc: 0.052 network: 0.049 permissions: 0.049 files: 0.048 performance: 0.041 KVM: 0.038 boot: 0.032 graphic: 0.026 debug: 0.248 semantic: 0.216 other: 0.089 files: 0.072 network: 0.072 PID: 0.068 socket: 0.050 boot: 0.039 performance: 0.031 permissions: 0.031 vnc: 0.031 device: 0.029 graphic: 0.015 KVM: 0.009 qemu64 CPU model is incorrect At the moment the "qemu64" CPU is defined as follows: ``` .vendor = CPUID_VENDOR_AMD, .family = 6, .model = 6, .stepping = 3, ``` According to Wikipedia [1] this means the CPU is defined as part of the K7 family while the AMD64 ISA was only introduced with the K8 series! This causes some software such as LLVM to notice the problem (32-bit cpu with 64-bit capability reported in the cpuid flag) and produce various error messages. The simple solution would be to upgrade this definition to use the Sledgehammer family (15) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_CPU_microarchitectures Your analysis of the problem with family makes sense & we do have mechanism to fix this in QEMU while keeping back compat for existing deployments. I'm curious as to the actual errors LLVM reports ? FWIW, even though qemu64 is the default CPU, practically everyone would be better off choosing one of the other CPU models explicitly to better suit their desired use case. There is some guidance here https://qemu.weilnetz.de/doc/qemu-doc.html#cpu_005fmodels The error message is a rather cryptic "LLVM ERROR: 64-bit code requested on a subtarget that doesn't support it!" as it knows Athlon CPUs don't support the AMD64 ISA. I will relay the tip to the people managing the VMs, I guess this problem went unnoticed for so long because there are not many `qemu64` users. I'm available to test a patch whenever it becomes available, I didn't directly send one because I was afraid of breaking the backward compatibility and some (many?) VMs. The QEMU project is currently considering to move its bug tracking to another system. For this we need to know which bugs are still valid and which could be closed already. Thus we are setting older bugs to "Incomplete" now. If you still think this bug report here is valid, then please switch the state back to "New" within the next 60 days, otherwise this report will be marked as "Expired". Or please mark it as "Fix Released" if the problem has been solved with a newer version of QEMU already. Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. This is an automated cleanup. This bug report has been moved to QEMU's new bug tracker on gitlab.com and thus gets marked as 'expired' now. Please continue with the discussion here: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/191