summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/python/tests/protocol.py (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* python: backport 'Remove deprecated get_event_loop calls'John Snow2025-09-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This method was deprecated in 3.12 because it ordinarily should not be used from coroutines; if there is not a currently running event loop, this automatically creates a new event loop - which is usually not what you want from code that would ever run in the bottom half. In our case, we do want this behavior in two places: (1) The synchronous shim, for convenience: this allows fully sync programs to use QEMUMonitorProtocol() without needing to set up an event loop beforehand. This is intentional to fully box in the async complexities into the legacy sync shim. (2) The qmp_tui shell; instead of relying on asyncio.run to create and run an asyncio program, we need to be able to pass the current asyncio loop to urwid setup functions. For convenience, again, we create one if one is not present to simplify the creation of the TUI appliance. The remaining user of get_event_loop() was in fact one of the erroneous users that should not have been using this function: if there's no running event loop inside of a coroutine, you're in big trouble :) Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> cherry picked from commit python-qemu-qmp@aa1ff9907603a3033296027e1bd021133df86ef1 Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
* python: backport 'drop Python3.6 workarounds'John Snow2025-09-151-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | Now that the minimum version is 3.7, drop some of the 3.6-specific hacks we've been carrying. A single remaining compatibility hack concerning 3.6's lack of @asynccontextmanager is addressed in the following commit. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> cherry picked from commit python-qemu-qmp@3e8e34e594cfc6b707e6f67959166acde4b421b8 Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
* python: rename qemu.aqmp to qemu.qmpJohn Snow2022-04-211-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that we are fully switched over to the new QMP library, move it back over the old namespace. This is being done primarily so that we may upload this package simply as "qemu.qmp" without introducing confusion over whether or not "aqmp" is a new protocol or not. The trade-off is increased confusion inside the QEMU developer tree. Sorry! Note: the 'private' member "_aqmp" in legacy.py also changes to "_qmp"; not out of necessity, but just to remove any traces of the "aqmp" name. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@openvz.org> Message-id: 20220330172812.3427355-8-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* python/aqmp: add start_server() and accept() methodsJohn Snow2022-03-071-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add start_server() and accept() methods that can be used instead of start_server_and_accept() to allow more fine-grained control over the incoming connection process. (Eagle-eyed reviewers will surely notice that it's a bit weird that "CONNECTING" is a state that's shared between both the start_server() and connect() states. That's absolutely true, and it's very true that checking on the presence of _accepted as an indicator of state is a hack. That's also very certainly true. But ... this keeps client code an awful lot simpler, as it doesn't have to care exactly *how* the connection is being made, just that it *is*. Is it worth disrupting that simplicity in order to provide a better state guard on `accept()`? Hm.) Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20220225205948.3693480-9-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* python/aqmp: refactor _do_accept() into two distinct stepsJohn Snow2022-03-071-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Refactor _do_accept() into _do_start_server() and _do_accept(). As of this commit, the former calls the latter, but in subsequent commits they'll be split apart. (So please forgive the misnomer for _do_start_server(); it will live up to its name shortly, and the docstring will be updated then too. I'm just cutting down on some churn.) Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20220225205948.3693480-7-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* python/aqmp: remove _new_session and _establish_connectionJohn Snow2022-03-071-2/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These two methods attempted to entirely envelop the logic of establishing a connection to a peer start to finish. However, we need to break apart the incoming connection step into more granular steps. We will no longer be able to reasonably constrain the logic inside of these helper functions. So, remove them - with _session_guard(), they no longer serve a real purpose. Although the public API doesn't change, the internal API does. Now that there are no intermediary methods between e.g. connect() and _do_connect(), there's no hook where the runstate is set. As a result, the test suite changes a little to cope with the new semantics of _do_accept() and _do_connect(). Lastly, take some pieces of the now-deleted docstrings and move them up to the public interface level. They were a little more detailed, and it won't hurt to keep them. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20220225205948.3693480-4-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* python/aqmp: rename 'accept()' to 'start_server_and_accept()'John Snow2022-03-071-12/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, I had a method named "accept()" that under-the-hood calls bind(2), listen(2) *and* accept(2). I meant this as a simplification and counterpart to the one-shot "connect()" method. This is confusing to readers who expect accept() to mean *just* accept(2). Since I need to split apart the "accept()" method into multiple methods anyway (one of which strongly resembling accept(2)), it feels pertinent to rename this method *now*. Rename this all-in-one method "start_server_and_accept()" instead. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20220225205948.3693480-3-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* python/aqmp: add LineProtocol testsJohn Snow2021-09-271-0/+48
| | | | | | | | | | | Tests a real connect, a real accept, and really sending and receiving a message over a UNIX socket. Brings coverage of protocol.py up to ~93%. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Message-id: 20210915162955.333025-27-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
* python/aqmp: add AsyncProtocol unit testsJohn Snow2021-09-271-0/+535
This tests most of protocol.py -- From a hacked up Coverage.py run, it's at about 86%. There's a few error cases that aren't very well tested yet, they're hard to induce artificially so far. I'm working on it. Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Message-id: 20210915162955.333025-26-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>