From e3a6e0daf47f43cdb02b42c4dd3694a8f00063d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zhaolichang Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:50:20 +0800 Subject: qemu/: fix some comment spelling errors I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu, so I used the spellcheck tool to check the spelling errors and finally found some spelling errors in the folder. Signed-off-by: zhaolichang Reviewed-by: Alex Bennee Message-Id: <20200917075029.313-2-zhaolichang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier --- accel/tcg/user-exec.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'accel/tcg/user-exec.c') diff --git a/accel/tcg/user-exec.c b/accel/tcg/user-exec.c index bb039eb32d..5c96819ded 100644 --- a/accel/tcg/user-exec.c +++ b/accel/tcg/user-exec.c @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static inline int handle_cpu_signal(uintptr_t pc, siginfo_t *info, * use that value directly. Within cpu_restore_state_from_tb, we * assume PC comes from GETPC(), as used by the helper functions, * so we adjust the address by -GETPC_ADJ to form an address that - * is within the call insn, so that the address does not accidentially + * is within the call insn, so that the address does not accidentally * match the beginning of the next guest insn. However, when the * pc comes from the signal frame it points to the actual faulting * host memory insn and not the return from a call insn. -- cgit 1.4.1