From 28cbbdd28e2979dbf9768a70754550b8e377fcc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Tokarev Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:13:50 +0300 Subject: hw/9pfs: spelling fixes Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck --- hw/9pfs/9p.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'hw/9pfs/9p.c') diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.c b/hw/9pfs/9p.c index 991645adca..323f042e65 100644 --- a/hw/9pfs/9p.c +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p.c @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static inline uint64_t mirror64bit(uint64_t value) } /* - * Parameter k for the Exponential Golomb algorihm to be used. + * Parameter k for the Exponential Golomb algorithm to be used. * * The smaller this value, the smaller the minimum bit count for the Exp. * Golomb generated affixes will be (at lowest index) however for the @@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn pdu_complete(V9fsPDU *pdu, ssize_t len) * Sending a reply would confuse clients because they would * assume that any EINTR is the actual result of the operation, * rather than a consequence of the cancellation. However, if - * the operation completed (succesfully or with an error other + * the operation completed (successfully or with an error other * than caused be cancellation), we do send out that reply, both * for efficiency and to avoid confusing the rest of the state machine * that assumes passing a non-error here will mean a successful -- cgit 1.4.1