From 5bd18d98cd88e2df1e1e274546a06ebe7fdd5eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Armbruster Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:40:00 +0100 Subject: tests/qapi-schema: Rework comments on longhand member definitions A few old comments talk about "desired future use of defaults" and "anonymous inline branch types". Kind of misleading since commit 87adbbffd4 "qapi: add a dictionary form for TYPE" added longhand member definitions. Talk about that instead. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster Message-Id: <20210323094025.3569441-4-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: John Snow --- tests/qapi-schema/nested-struct-data.json | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tests/qapi-schema/nested-struct-data.json') diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/nested-struct-data.json b/tests/qapi-schema/nested-struct-data.json index 5b8a40cca3..2980d45d05 100644 --- a/tests/qapi-schema/nested-struct-data.json +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/nested-struct-data.json @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -# inline subtypes collide with our desired future use of defaults +# {} is not a valid type reference { 'command': 'foo', 'data': { 'a' : { 'type': {} }, 'b' : 'str' } } -- cgit 1.4.1