summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/959
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:34:26 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:35:44 +0000
commit25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 (patch)
tree0f056db167683be54ea1e5e72d29d6069af55e7d /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/959
parent8e6da29e4ee5fc14bc1cc816a24f21271f14090d (diff)
downloadqemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.tar.gz
qemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.zip
add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/959')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/95921
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/959 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/959
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..38e6babf4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/959
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is that when running a FreeBSD guest on an M1 Mac using QEMU, the CPU utilization hits 100% even when the guest is idle.
+
+First, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is about CPU usage spiking to 100%, which indicates a performance issue. So I'm thinking the category might be 'performance'. But wait, let's consider other possibilities too.
+
+Could it be related to how the code is translated? Mistranslation usually affects specific instructions or functions, causing incorrect behavior. This seems more about resource usage rather than semantic errors.
+
+Assembly lowering could be a factor if the issue arises from how assembly code is optimized, but again, that's more about specific operations rather than overall CPU usage.
+
+Looking at other categories: device, graphic, network, etc., these are all related to hardware or system components. The problem here is specifically about CPU utilization, so those don't fit directly.
+
+Hypervisor could be relevant because QEMU acts as a hypervisor when running virtual machines. If the hypervisor isn't managing resources efficiently, that could lead to high CPU usage. But since the issue is performance-related and not directly about hypervisor functionality itself, 'performance' might still be more accurate.
+
+Kernel or peripherals: These are lower-level components, but again, the symptom points more towards overall performance rather than a specific kernel module or peripheral device.
+
+So after considering all options, 'performance' seems like the best fit because it's about how QEMU is using CPU resources under load.
+</think>
+
+performance
\ No newline at end of file