restructure results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1830821 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1830821
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..18dacb9d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1830821
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify the bug report about exposing MDS_NO in the guest under QEMU. Let me start by understanding what the bug is about.
+
+The description says that MDS_NO is bit 5 of ARCH_CAPABILITIES and it needs to be exposed to the guest. So, this seems related to how certain CPU capabilities are presented to the virtual machine.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+MDS stands for Microarchitectural Data Sampling, which is a CPU vulnerability. Exposing this bit likely involves how QEMU handles CPU features and capabilities when running a guest OS. Since it's about exposing a specific capability bit to the guest, this probably relates to how QEMU presents CPU information to the virtualized environment.
+
+In QEMU/KVM, there are mechanisms like kvm_setarch that expose CPU capabilities. If MDS_NO is part of ARCH_CAPABILITIES, it might be about correctly setting or passing this capability so the guest can handle it, possibly for mitigating vulnerabilities.
+
+Looking at the categories, "hypervisor" seems fitting because it's about how QEMU (as a hypervisor) exposes hardware features to the guest. Alternatively, it could relate to device handling, but I think hypervisor is more precise here since it's about CPU capabilities exposed through KVM.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file