restructure results

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/2063 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/2063
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..139a91a44
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/2063
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned that the performance with QEMU using -accel whpx on a Server 2022 host is poor when running a Windows 10 guest compared to Hyper-V. They suspect it's because QEMU isn't providing the necessary Hyper-V enlightenment hints, and they tried using hv-XXX cpu options but didn't see any effect.
+
+Looking at the cpuid dumps provided, the main difference seems to be that the QEMU guest is not receiving the same CPUID data as the Hyper-V VM. Specifically, the hypervisor identifiers (like eax=4000000b in Hyper-V) are missing in QEMU's case, instead showing 0x40000010 and other values.
+
+The bug report is pointing out that the performance issue arises because the guest isn't getting the correct CPUID data from the hypervisor. This seems related to how QEMU handles hypervisor identification and provides this information to the virtual machine. Since it's about missing or incorrect hypervisor-related data leading to performance issues, the most fitting category would be 'hypervisor'.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation because that usually refers to incorrect mapping in user-mode assembly or IR. It's more about how QEMU interacts with the hypervisor layer. Other categories like network, socket, or device don't seem to apply here as the issue is specific to CPUID and hypervisor hints.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file