restructure results

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/645524 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/645524
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9bcc78f4e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/645524
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification step by step. The user is experiencing an issue where their USB webcam isn't working correctly in a KVM virtual machine. They've set up QEMU with the appropriate switches to pass through the webcam, and while the guest OS (Windows XP) recognizes it, the video feed doesn't work as expected—it shows a black image instead of the actual video.
+
+First, I need to identify the key components involved here. The user is using KVM for virtualization, which suggests that this is related to hypervisor functionality. They're passing through USB devices, which ties into device assignment in QEMU. The issue arises with multiple webcams and across different setups, indicating a broader problem rather than something specific to one camera or configuration.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: "hypervisor" seems like a strong candidate because the bug is within KVM's handling of hardware passthrough. While there are other relevant categories like "device," "USB," or even "graphic," the most precise category here would be under the hypervisor's management of USB devices, which in this case isn't working as intended.
+
+Additionally, since it's related to QEMU/KVM and specifically to device passthrough (USB webcam), "hypervisor" captures the root cause better than just "device" alone. The problem is not with the guest OS drivers or user-mode assembly but rather how KVM/QEMU handles the hardware in the virtual environment.
+
+So, putting it all together, the classification should be under the hypervisor category.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file