restructure results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/694 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/694
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5a7e7f46f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/694
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The bug is titled "Crash using MIPS I7200 CPU with non-nanoMIPS ELF." Let me break this down.
+
+First, the mention of the MIPS I7200 CPU suggests that this is related to a specific processor architecture supported by QEMU. The crash occurs when using non-nanoMIPS ELF binaries. Since QEMU acts as a hypervisor or emulator for different hardware, including CPUs, the issue here likely stems from how it handles the MIPS instruction set.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc., but none seem to fit directly. The problem is with the CPU and its handling of certain binaries. This points towards a potential issue in how QEMU translates instructions or emulates the MIPS architecture.
+
+The term "ELF" refers to the Executable and Linkable Format, which is an object file format used for executables, shared libraries, etc. Non-nanoMIPS might imply that it's using the standard MIPS instruction set without some optimizations provided by nanoMIPS, which could affect how QEMU emulates or translates these instructions.
+
+So, considering this, the issue isn't with user-mode assembly translation but rather with the CPU emulation itself in the hypervisor context. The crash likely happens during the execution of a MIPS binary that's not optimized for nanoMIPS, leading to an incorrect handling by QEMU's MIPS I7200 CPU model.
+
+Therefore, the most fitting category is "hypervisor" because it relates to how QEMU emulates the CPU and handles different instruction sets.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file