restructure results

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1923629 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1923629
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ff7dabb42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/other/1923629
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is talking about an issue with RISC-V vector instructions in QEMU, specifically the vssub.vv instruction not saturating when subtracting zero from 0x80000000. They expected it to produce 0x7FFFFFFF but got 0x80000000 instead.
+
+First, I need to understand what's happening here. RISC-V vector instructions deal with vectors, which are essentially arrays of data processed in a single operation. The vssub.vv instruction subtracts two vectors and should handle overflow by saturating the result if it goes beyond the representable range.
+
+The user provided code snippets: vmv.v.i v16, 0 loads a vector where all elements are zero into v16, and then vssub.vv v8,v16,v8 subtracts v16 from each element of v8. If v8 has 0x80000000 in an element, subtracting zero should leave it as is, but according to the user, it's not saturating when it should.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. The others are 'other'.
+
+Since this is related to vector instruction handling, which falls under the CPU's instruction set implementation. Mistranslation would imply that the translation from source to IR or target is incorrect, but here it's about not following the expected behavior of an instruction in terms of saturation, which might be a bug in the execution logic rather than translation.
+
+The issue could also relate to assembly lowering if there's a problem during code generation for the target architecture. But more likely, it's a problem with how QEMU handles vector instructions at runtime, specifically not correctly implementing the saturation behavior as defined by RISC-V specifications.
+
+Looking at the categories again, 'other' might cover this since it doesn't fit into device, graphic, socket, etc., and is more about the CPU instruction handling. However, considering that the issue is with how an instruction is processed (not translation but execution), maybe 'mistranslation' isn't the right term here because mistranslation usually refers to incorrect mapping during translation from source to IR or target code.
+
+Alternatively, this might be a bug in assembly lowering if it's part of generating machine code. But I'm not entirely sure. Since the user is using QEMU and the issue is with vector instruction handling, which isn't directly one of the listed categories except perhaps 'other', I think 'other' would be appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is related to incorrect behavior in handling a specific RISC-V vector instruction (vssub.vv) not saturating as expected. This falls under an issue with the CPU's instruction set implementation, which doesn't fit neatly into any of the provided categories except for 'other'.
+
+**Answer:** other
\ No newline at end of file