summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/classification_output/04/other/92957605
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'classification_output/04/other/92957605')
-rw-r--r--classification_output/04/other/92957605426
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 426 deletions
diff --git a/classification_output/04/other/92957605 b/classification_output/04/other/92957605
deleted file mode 100644
index fe9db1c7d..000000000
--- a/classification_output/04/other/92957605
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,426 +0,0 @@
-other: 0.997
-semantic: 0.995
-device: 0.993
-socket: 0.993
-instruction: 0.993
-assembly: 0.992
-boot: 0.992
-network: 0.989
-graphic: 0.986
-KVM: 0.982
-vnc: 0.981
-mistranslation: 0.974
-
-[Qemu-devel] Fwd:  [BUG] Failed to compile using gcc7.1
-
-Hi all,
-I encountered the same problem on gcc 7.1.1 and found Qu's mail in
-this list from google search.
-
-Temporarily fix it by specifying the string length in snprintf
-directive. Hope this is helpful to other people encountered the same
-problem.
-
-@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
----
---- a/block/blkdebug.c
--                 "blkdebug:%s:%s", s->config_file ?: "",
---- a/block/blkverify.c
--                 "blkverify:%s:%s",
---- a/hw/usb/bus.c
--        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%s.%d",
--        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%d", portnr);
---
-+++ b/block/blkdebug.c
-+                 "blkdebug:%.2037s:%.2037s", s->config_file ?: "",
-+++ b/block/blkverify.c
-+                 "blkverify:%.2038s:%.2038s",
-+++ b/hw/usb/bus.c
-+        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%.12s.%d",
-+        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%.12d", portnr);
-
-Tsung-en Hsiao
-
->
-Qu Wenruo Wrote:
->
->
-Hi all,
->
->
-After upgrading gcc from 6.3.1 to 7.1.1, qemu can't be compiled with gcc.
->
->
-The error is:
->
->
-------
->
-CC      block/blkdebug.o
->
-block/blkdebug.c: In function 'blkdebug_refresh_filename':
->
->
-block/blkdebug.c:693:31: error: '%s' directive output may be truncated
->
-writing up to 4095 bytes into a region of size 4086
->
-[-Werror=format-truncation=]
->
->
-"blkdebug:%s:%s", s->config_file ?: "",
->
-^~
->
-In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:939:0,
->
-from /home/adam/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:68,
->
-from block/blkdebug.c:25:
->
->
-/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:64:10: note: '__builtin___snprintf_chk' output 11
->
-or more bytes (assuming 4106) into a destination of size 4096
->
->
-return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
->
-^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
->
-__bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
->
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
->
-cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
->
-make: *** [/home/adam/qemu/rules.mak:69: block/blkdebug.o] Error 1
->
-------
->
->
-It seems that gcc 7 is introducing more restrict check for printf.
->
->
-If using clang, although there are some extra warning, it can at least pass
->
-the compile.
->
->
-Thanks,
->
-Qu
-
-Hi Tsung-en,
-
-On 06/11/2017 04:08 PM, Tsung-en Hsiao wrote:
-Hi all,
-I encountered the same problem on gcc 7.1.1 and found Qu's mail in
-this list from google search.
-
-Temporarily fix it by specifying the string length in snprintf
-directive. Hope this is helpful to other people encountered the same
-problem.
-Thank your for sharing this.
-@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
----
---- a/block/blkdebug.c
--                 "blkdebug:%s:%s", s->config_file ?: "",
---- a/block/blkverify.c
--                 "blkverify:%s:%s",
---- a/hw/usb/bus.c
--        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%s.%d",
--        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%d", portnr);
---
-+++ b/block/blkdebug.c
-+                 "blkdebug:%.2037s:%.2037s", s->config_file ?: "",
-It is a rather funny way to silent this warning :) Truncating the
-filename until it fits.
-However I don't think it is the correct way since there is indeed an
-overflow of bs->exact_filename.
-Apparently exact_filename from "block/block_int.h" is defined to hold a
-pathname:
-char exact_filename[PATH_MAX];
-but is used for more than that (for example in blkdebug.c it might use
-until 10+2*PATH_MAX chars).
-I suppose it started as a buffer to hold a pathname then more block
-drivers were added and this buffer ended used differently.
-If it is a multi-purpose buffer one safer option might be to declare it
-as a GString* and use g_string_printf().
-I CC'ed the block folks to have their feedback.
-
-Regards,
-
-Phil.
-+++ b/block/blkverify.c
-+                 "blkverify:%.2038s:%.2038s",
-+++ b/hw/usb/bus.c
-+        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%.12s.%d",
-+        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%.12d", portnr);
-
-Tsung-en Hsiao
-Qu Wenruo Wrote:
-
-Hi all,
-
-After upgrading gcc from 6.3.1 to 7.1.1, qemu can't be compiled with gcc.
-
-The error is:
-
-------
- CC      block/blkdebug.o
-block/blkdebug.c: In function 'blkdebug_refresh_filename':
-
-block/blkdebug.c:693:31: error: '%s' directive output may be truncated writing 
-up to 4095 bytes into a region of size 4086 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
-
-                 "blkdebug:%s:%s", s->config_file ?: "",
-                              ^~
-In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:939:0,
-                from /home/adam/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:68,
-                from block/blkdebug.c:25:
-
-/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:64:10: note: '__builtin___snprintf_chk' output 11 or 
-more bytes (assuming 4106) into a destination of size 4096
-
-  return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
-         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-       __bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
-       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
-make: *** [/home/adam/qemu/rules.mak:69: block/blkdebug.o] Error 1
-------
-
-It seems that gcc 7 is introducing more restrict check for printf.
-
-If using clang, although there are some extra warning, it can at least pass the 
-compile.
-
-Thanks,
-Qu
-
-On 2017-06-12 05:19, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
->
-Hi Tsung-en,
->
->
-On 06/11/2017 04:08 PM, Tsung-en Hsiao wrote:
->
-> Hi all,
->
-> I encountered the same problem on gcc 7.1.1 and found Qu's mail in
->
-> this list from google search.
->
->
->
-> Temporarily fix it by specifying the string length in snprintf
->
-> directive. Hope this is helpful to other people encountered the same
->
-> problem.
->
->
-Thank your for sharing this.
->
->
->
->
-> @@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
->
-> ---
->
-> --- a/block/blkdebug.c
->
-> -                 "blkdebug:%s:%s", s->config_file ?: "",
->
-> --- a/block/blkverify.c
->
-> -                 "blkverify:%s:%s",
->
-> --- a/hw/usb/bus.c
->
-> -        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%s.%d",
->
-> -        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%d",
->
-> portnr);
->
-> --
->
-> +++ b/block/blkdebug.c
->
-> +                 "blkdebug:%.2037s:%.2037s", s->config_file ?: "",
->
->
-It is a rather funny way to silent this warning :) Truncating the
->
-filename until it fits.
->
->
-However I don't think it is the correct way since there is indeed an
->
-overflow of bs->exact_filename.
->
->
-Apparently exact_filename from "block/block_int.h" is defined to hold a
->
-pathname:
->
-char exact_filename[PATH_MAX];
->
->
-but is used for more than that (for example in blkdebug.c it might use
->
-until 10+2*PATH_MAX chars).
-In any case, truncating the filenames will do just as much as truncating
-the result: You'll get an unusable filename.
-
->
-I suppose it started as a buffer to hold a pathname then more block
->
-drivers were added and this buffer ended used differently.
->
->
-If it is a multi-purpose buffer one safer option might be to declare it
->
-as a GString* and use g_string_printf().
-What it is supposed to be now is just an information string we can print
-to the user, because strings are nicer than JSON objects. There are some
-commands that take a filename for identifying a block node, but I dream
-we can get rid of them in 3.0...
-
-The right solution is to remove it altogether and have a
-"char *bdrv_filename(BlockDriverState *bs)" function (which generates
-the filename every time it's called). I've been working on this for some
-years now, actually, but it was never pressing enough to get it finished
-(so I never had enough time).
-
-What we can do in the meantime is to not generate a plain filename if it
-won't fit into bs->exact_filename.
-
-(The easiest way to do this probably would be to truncate
-bs->exact_filename back to an empty string if snprintf() returns a value
-greater than or equal to the length of bs->exact_filename.)
-
-What to do about hw/usb/bus.c I don't know (I guess the best solution
-would be to ignore the warning, but I don't suppose that is going to work).
-
-Max
-
->
->
-I CC'ed the block folks to have their feedback.
->
->
-Regards,
->
->
-Phil.
->
->
-> +++ b/block/blkverify.c
->
-> +                 "blkverify:%.2038s:%.2038s",
->
-> +++ b/hw/usb/bus.c
->
-> +        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%.12s.%d",
->
-> +        snprintf(downstream->path, sizeof(downstream->path), "%.12d",
->
-> portnr);
->
->
->
-> Tsung-en Hsiao
->
->
->
->> Qu Wenruo Wrote:
->
->>
->
->> Hi all,
->
->>
->
->> After upgrading gcc from 6.3.1 to 7.1.1, qemu can't be compiled with
->
->> gcc.
->
->>
->
->> The error is:
->
->>
->
->> ------
->
->>  CC      block/blkdebug.o
->
->> block/blkdebug.c: In function 'blkdebug_refresh_filename':
->
->>
->
->> block/blkdebug.c:693:31: error: '%s' directive output may be
->
->> truncated writing up to 4095 bytes into a region of size 4086
->
->> [-Werror=format-truncation=]
->
->>
->
->>                  "blkdebug:%s:%s", s->config_file ?: "",
->
->>                               ^~
->
->> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:939:0,
->
->>                 from /home/adam/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:68,
->
->>                 from block/blkdebug.c:25:
->
->>
->
->> /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:64:10: note: '__builtin___snprintf_chk'
->
->> output 11 or more bytes (assuming 4106) into a destination of size 4096
->
->>
->
->>   return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
->
->>          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
->
->>        __bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
->
->>        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
->
->> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
->
->> make: *** [/home/adam/qemu/rules.mak:69: block/blkdebug.o] Error 1
->
->> ------
->
->>
->
->> It seems that gcc 7 is introducing more restrict check for printf.
->
->>
->
->> If using clang, although there are some extra warning, it can at
->
->> least pass the compile.
->
->>
->
->> Thanks,
->
->> Qu
->
->
-signature.asc
-Description:
-OpenPGP digital signature
-