1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/118/none/1847467 b/results/classifier/118/none/1847467
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9def68f56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/118/none/1847467
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+x86: 0.448
+device: 0.207
+mistranslation: 0.196
+performance: 0.187
+peripherals: 0.174
+network: 0.170
+i386: 0.168
+graphic: 0.155
+architecture: 0.148
+semantic: 0.143
+risc-v: 0.135
+user-level: 0.133
+vnc: 0.128
+ppc: 0.123
+register: 0.118
+virtual: 0.110
+PID: 0.108
+hypervisor: 0.106
+permissions: 0.103
+socket: 0.102
+VMM: 0.101
+arm: 0.096
+boot: 0.094
+kernel: 0.094
+KVM: 0.089
+debug: 0.082
+TCG: 0.067
+files: 0.059
+assembly: 0.050
+
+qemu-x86_64 segment prefixes error
+
+qemu-x86_64 version 4.1.0 (qemu-x86_64 version 4.0.0 also have the issue)
+
+In 64-bit mode (x86_64) the DS, ES, SS or CS segment prefixes should be ignored; qemu-x86_64 does not ignore them.
+
+example: an x86_64 instructions preceded by FS DS (0x64 0x26) segment prefixes have the linear address of its memory reference flat-mapped (as if DS was in action) whereas it should be FS-mapped (offset by FS_base, because the DS, ES, SS or CS are just ignored).
+
+
+I attach a small C++ program that shows this discrepancy.
+
+$ ./sample
+I'm not in QEMU
+
+$ qemu-x86_64 ./sample
+I'm in QEMU
+
+
+
+The QEMU project is currently considering to move its bug tracking to
+another system. For this we need to know which bugs are still valid
+and which could be closed already. Thus we are setting older bugs to
+"Incomplete" now.
+
+If you still think this bug report here is valid, then please switch
+the state back to "New" within the next 60 days, otherwise this report
+will be marked as "Expired". Or please mark it as "Fix Released" if
+the problem has been solved with a newer version of QEMU already.
+
+Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience.
+
+
+Repro case in comment #1 still demonstrates bug.
+
+
+
+This is an automated cleanup. This bug report has been moved to QEMU's
+new bug tracker on gitlab.com and thus gets marked as 'expired' now.
+Please continue with the discussion here:
+
+ https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/267
+
+