1 files changed, 70 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/118/none/1909823 b/results/classifier/118/none/1909823
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5526d494c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/118/none/1909823
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+architecture: 0.735
+TCG: 0.723
+i386: 0.707
+semantic: 0.690
+device: 0.671
+graphic: 0.666
+x86: 0.641
+peripherals: 0.637
+kernel: 0.634
+register: 0.623
+network: 0.621
+socket: 0.595
+ppc: 0.594
+user-level: 0.590
+files: 0.587
+permissions: 0.558
+performance: 0.557
+assembly: 0.526
+PID: 0.526
+debug: 0.514
+risc-v: 0.513
+mistranslation: 0.511
+arm: 0.511
+hypervisor: 0.511
+vnc: 0.503
+boot: 0.471
+VMM: 0.462
+KVM: 0.408
+virtual: 0.403
+
+RDPMC check on PCE is backwards
+
+At [this line](https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/75ee62ac606bfc9eb59310b9446df3434bf6e8c2/target/i386/tcg/misc_helper.c#L225) the check on CR4_PCE_MASK is backwards: it's raising an exception if the flag is set (and CPL != 0) rather than if the flag is clear.
+
+It's low priority at the moment because the instruction isn't implemented, so you get an illegal opcode exception when expecting a GPF, or vice versa, but it's a time bomb for if it is ever implemented.
+
+The Intel docs also indicate that CR0.PE influences the protection; I don't know if that's already reflected in env->hflags & HF_CPL_MASK.
+
+The QEMU project is currently moving its bug tracking to another system.
+For this we need to know which bugs are still valid and which could be
+closed already. Thus we are setting the bug state to "Incomplete" now.
+
+If the bug has already been fixed in the latest upstream version of QEMU,
+then please close this ticket as "Fix released".
+
+If it is not fixed yet and you think that this bug report here is still
+valid, then you have two options:
+
+1) If you already have an account on gitlab.com, please open a new ticket
+for this problem in our new tracker here:
+
+    https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues
+
+and then close this ticket here on Launchpad (or let it expire auto-
+matically after 60 days). Please mention the URL of this bug ticket on
+Launchpad in the new ticket on GitLab.
+
+2) If you don't have an account on gitlab.com and don't intend to get
+one, but still would like to keep this ticket opened, then please switch
+the state back to "New" or "Confirmed" within the next 60 days (other-
+wise it will get closed as "Expired"). We will then eventually migrate
+the ticket automatically to the new system (but you won't be the reporter
+of the bug in the new system and thus you won't get notified on changes
+anymore).
+
+Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience.
+
+
+It looks like this was fixed in c45b426.
+