diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/118/none/1926202')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/118/none/1926202 | 133 |
1 files changed, 133 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/118/none/1926202 b/results/classifier/118/none/1926202 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9c2aa6027 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/118/none/1926202 @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +peripherals: 0.629 +user-level: 0.601 +ppc: 0.585 +debug: 0.556 +mistranslation: 0.541 +performance: 0.530 +permissions: 0.523 +semantic: 0.516 +risc-v: 0.512 +TCG: 0.506 +x86: 0.483 +arm: 0.482 +VMM: 0.458 +graphic: 0.429 +PID: 0.416 +device: 0.407 +architecture: 0.400 +KVM: 0.395 +virtual: 0.386 +assembly: 0.383 +vnc: 0.378 +hypervisor: 0.374 +register: 0.350 +boot: 0.348 +files: 0.304 +socket: 0.283 +kernel: 0.278 +network: 0.261 +i386: 0.208 + +qemu-user can't run some ppc binaries + +qemu-user v6.0.0-rc5, built in static mode, will crash for certain ppc binaries. It seems to have something to do with glibc for some Centos versions. The problem is easiest to see with statically-linked binaries. + +The attached Dockerfile shows how to produce a ppc binary that will crash qemu-user. Here is how to reproduce the problem: + +$ uname -m +x86_64 +$ docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static --reset -p yes +$ docker build -t qemu-bug:centos -f Dockerfile.centos . +$ docker run --rm -it -v$PWD:$PWD -w$PWD qemu-bug:centos cp /helloworld-centos.static.ppc . +$ qemu-ppc version 5.2.95 (v6.0.0-rc5) +Copyright (c) 2003-2021 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers +$ qemu-ppc-static ./helloworld-centos.static.ppc +emu: uncaught target signal 4 (Illegal instruction) - core dumped +[1] 16678 illegal hardware instruction (core dumped) qemu-ppc-static ./helloworld-centos.static.ppc + +I can also provide the binary if necessary. + + + + + +Could you provide directly the binary to test (helloworld-centos.static.ppc)? + +helloworld-centos.static.ppc is attached as part of comment #2 + +Thank you. I can reproduce the problem. + +This is not a regression (reproduced with 5.2 and 5.1) + + IN: strlen + 0x1000d780: 7d2a03f8 cmpb r10, r9, r0 + + OP: + ld_i32 tmp0,env,$0xfffffffffffffff0 + brcond_i32 tmp0,$0x0,lt,$L0 + + ---- 1000d780 + mov_i32 nip,$0x1000d780 + mov_i32 tmp0,$0x60 + mov_i32 tmp4,$0x21 + call raise_exception_err,$0x2,$0,env,tmp0,tmp4 + exit_tb $0x0 + set_label $L0 + exit_tb $0x7efd50022283 + +"cmpb" is define in ISA 2.05, but qemu-ppc (32bit) defines by default a PowerPC 750 that is not ISA 2.05. + +It doesn't seem QEMU supports ISA 2.05 for any 32bit PowerPC (only POWER7 and above, that are 64bit processors). + +Thanks for looking into this. What reference did you use to check which ISA "cmpb" is in? + + + +Le 29/04/2021 à 19:20, Aaron Simmons a écrit : +> Thanks for looking into this. What reference did you use to check which +> ISA "cmpb" is in? +> + +It's in the QEMU source, but you can check the specs: + +POWER ISA 2.04 -> no cmpb + +https://wiki.raptorcs.com/w/images/6/65/PowerISA_V2.04-FINAL.Public.pdf + +POWER ISA 2.05 -> cmpb + +https://wiki.raptorcs.com/w/images/5/50/PowerISA_V2.05.pdf + + +The QEMU project is currently moving its bug tracking to another system. +For this we need to know which bugs are still valid and which could be +closed already. Thus we are setting the bug state to "Incomplete" now. + +If the bug has already been fixed in the latest upstream version of QEMU, +then please close this ticket as "Fix released". + +If it is not fixed yet and you think that this bug report here is still +valid, then you have two options: + +1) If you already have an account on gitlab.com, please open a new ticket +for this problem in our new tracker here: + + https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues + +and then close this ticket here on Launchpad (or let it expire auto- +matically after 60 days). Please mention the URL of this bug ticket on +Launchpad in the new ticket on GitLab. + +2) If you don't have an account on gitlab.com and don't intend to get +one, but still would like to keep this ticket opened, then please switch +the state back to "New" or "Confirmed" within the next 60 days (other- +wise it will get closed as "Expired"). We will then eventually migrate +the ticket automatically to the new system (but you won't be the reporter +of the bug in the new system and thus you won't get notified on changes +anymore). + +Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. + + +[Expired for QEMU because there has been no activity for 60 days.] + |