summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/118/performance/1569491
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/118/performance/1569491')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/118/performance/156949142
1 files changed, 42 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/118/performance/1569491 b/results/classifier/118/performance/1569491
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..96d86128b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/118/performance/1569491
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+i386: 0.985
+performance: 0.975
+architecture: 0.896
+graphic: 0.872
+device: 0.793
+mistranslation: 0.694
+ppc: 0.667
+network: 0.626
+semantic: 0.565
+register: 0.447
+vnc: 0.415
+socket: 0.409
+boot: 0.409
+permissions: 0.408
+user-level: 0.389
+risc-v: 0.320
+files: 0.288
+arm: 0.284
+PID: 0.272
+debug: 0.225
+x86: 0.220
+TCG: 0.210
+peripherals: 0.210
+virtual: 0.202
+VMM: 0.179
+assembly: 0.134
+hypervisor: 0.132
+kernel: 0.052
+KVM: 0.029
+
+qemu system i386 poor performance on e5500 core
+
+I had been tested with generic core net building or with mtune e5500 but i have the same result: performances 
+are extremly low compared with other classes of powerpc cpu.
+The strange is the 5020 2ghz in all emulators been tested by me is comparable with a 970MP 2.7 ghz in speed and benchmarks but im facing the half of performance in i386-soft-mmu compared with a 2.5 ghz 970MP.
+
+I'm triaging old bugs: Can you provide command lines, versions, and steps to test and measure the relative performance?
+
+At the very least, please try to confirm on the latest version of QEMU (5.2.0-rc0, if possible) to update this report.
+
+[Expired for QEMU because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
+