diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/118/performance/1798057')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/118/performance/1798057 | 72 |
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/118/performance/1798057 b/results/classifier/118/performance/1798057 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0945dfd81 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/118/performance/1798057 @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +performance: 0.812 +KVM: 0.665 +architecture: 0.657 +files: 0.650 +hypervisor: 0.637 +graphic: 0.612 +semantic: 0.609 +kernel: 0.573 +debug: 0.565 +device: 0.479 +ppc: 0.473 +user-level: 0.412 +x86: 0.412 +socket: 0.376 +network: 0.329 +risc-v: 0.326 +mistranslation: 0.301 +register: 0.296 +PID: 0.287 +vnc: 0.284 +boot: 0.256 +arm: 0.229 +permissions: 0.216 +VMM: 0.206 +peripherals: 0.198 +virtual: 0.179 +TCG: 0.177 +assembly: 0.092 +i386: 0.081 + +Not able to start instances larger than 1 TB + +Specs: + +CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6132 CPU @ 2.60GHz +OS: Ubuntu 18.04 AMD64 +QEMU: 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.6 (Ubuntu Bionic Package) +Openstack: Openstack Queens (Ubuntu Bionic Package) +Libvirt-daemon: 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.5 +Seabios: 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 + + +The Problem: +We are not able to start instances, which have a memory size over 1 TB. +After starting the instance, they shortly lock up. Starting guests with a lower amount of RAM works +perfectly. We dealt with the same problem in the past with an older Qemu Version (2.5) by patching some source files according to this patch: + +https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!!qemu-kvm.git/34b32196890e2c41b0aee042e600ba422f29db17/SOURCES!kvm-fix-guest-physical-bits-to-match-host-to-go-beyond-1.patch + + +I think we now have somewhat the same problem here, however the source base changed and I'am not able to find the corresponding snippet to patch this. + +Also, guests show a wrong physical address size which is probably the cause of the lock ups on high memory guests: +root@debug:~# grep physical /proc/cpuinfo +physical id : 0 +address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual + +Any way to fix this? + +Hi Alex, + You should be able to fix this by passing the right cpu flags, e.g.: + +-cpu IvyBridge,host-phys-bits=yes + +or + +-cpu IvyBridge,physbits=46 + +Dave + +I'm assuming that the right physbits setting fixed the bug? ... so I'm marking this ticket as "Invalid". If the problem still persists, then please open again. + |