diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1612908')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1612908 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1612908 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1612908 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e53cab36e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/network/1612908 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through the problem again. + +The user is reporting an issue with the qom-* scripts in QEMU. They mention that when using these commands (like qom-list, etc.), they can specify either a Unix socket or a TCP endpoint as per the help text. However, while the Unix socket works, the TCP endpoint doesn't. The problem seems to be that the scripts don't process the '-s' argument correctly into a tuple format that the QEMUMonitorProtocol expects. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +I need to determine which category fits best. The issue is about how command-line arguments are handled, specifically with TCP endpoints versus Unix sockets. The problem is in the way the argument is parsed and passed to the protocol handling part of QEMU. + +TCP endpoints involve network communication, so 'network' seems relevant. Alternatively, it could be a parsing or argument handling issue that's more related to how the command-line options are processed, which might fall under 'other' if it doesn't fit another specific category like 'socket' or 'network'. + +Wait, but since it's about connecting via TCP and not Unix sockets working, maybe 'network' is the better fit because it's a network-related issue with the connection handling. Alternatively, if it's more about argument parsing, perhaps 'other'. But looking at the categories again, I think 'socket' might be too specific since the problem isn't directly about socket operations but about how the endpoint is passed. + +Hmm. The user mentioned that the QEMUMonitorProtocol expects either a string (unix) or a tuple (host:port). So it's more about parsing the argument into the correct format, which relates to how the scripts handle command-line arguments, not necessarily the network connection itself. Since none of the other categories like 'network' directly address this parsing issue, maybe 'other' is appropriate. + +Wait, but 'socket' could be related because it's about connecting via a socket (though TCP isn't a socket in the traditional sense; sockets are for Unix domain). Alternatively, since the problem is that TCP endpoints aren't being handled correctly, and network connections involve sockets, perhaps 'network' is still the right category. + +I think I'm leaning towards 'network' because it's about establishing a connection via TCP, which falls under network functionality. But if the issue is more about argument parsing or command-line handling, maybe 'other' would be better. However, considering that the root cause is the scripts not correctly processing the TCP endpoint into the required tuple format for the protocol, it's more about how the network connection is being established, hence 'network'. +</think> + +network \ No newline at end of file |