diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/peripherals/1162644')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/peripherals/1162644 | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/peripherals/1162644 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/peripherals/1162644 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..651972162 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/peripherals/1162644 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user provided a detailed bug report about QEMU crashing when using a USB 3.0 tablet (xhci) on an Ubuntu system. + +First, looking at the error message: `qemu-system-x86_64 crashed with SIGABRT in __assert_fail_base()`. The assertion failed in `usb/core.c` at line 552, specifically the condition `p->iov.iov != ((void *)0)`. This suggests there's an issue with the USB handling code. + +The user is using QEMU version 1.4.0+dfsg-1expubuntu4 and ran into this when trying to boot a VM with a USB tablet device. They mentioned it's part of the virt-test suite, which tests various QEMU functionalities. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The crash is happening in USB-related code (`usb/core.c`), which falls under hardware devices, specifically USB peripherals. Therefore, the category should be 'device'. However, since it's related to USB specifically, maybe 'peripherals' would be more accurate because USB devices are considered peripherals. + +But upon closer examination, the categories don't have a specific 'USB' or 'peripherals' tag. The closest is 'device', which is broader and could encompass all types of hardware devices including USB. Alternatively, 'peripherals' might be better if that's a separate category. Since 'peripherals' isn't explicitly listed beyond general device categories, I'll go with 'device'. + +Wait, looking again, the options are: device, graphic, socket, network, etc. Since it's about USB devices, which are input/output devices, 'peripherals' would be more precise if available, but since that's not a category here, 'device' is the best fit. + +However, considering that USB handling might also involve low-level interactions with the kernel, maybe it's related to the kernel. But the error seems specific to QEMU's USB code, so perhaps 'peripherals' would be more accurate if such a category exists. Since the user mentioned ' peripherals' as an option in their list, I think that's the right classification. + +Wait, no, looking back at the categories provided by the user: the options include device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. So 'peripherals' is indeed an option. Therefore, this bug should be classified under 'peripherals' as it relates to USB devices which are peripherals. +</think> + +The bug report describes a crash in QEMU when using a USB 3.0 tablet device, specifically failing in the USB core code (`usb/core.c`). This issue pertains to hardware device handling, particularly USB peripherals. + +**Classification:** peripherals \ No newline at end of file |