summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1811782
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1811782')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/181178215
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1811782 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1811782
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7556b8b34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/boot/1811782
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned that when using QEMU on Windows, it fails to mount the rootfs from an ISO that works fine on Linux. So, the issue occurs in the Windows version but not the Linux one.
+
+First, I need to look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. The user's problem is related to mounting a rootfs during boot, which points towards issues in the boot process.
+
+I remember that when QEMU boots an ISO, it emulates hardware and the guest OS (in this case, Linux) interacts with that emulation. If it works on Linux but not Windows, there might be differences in how QEMU is configured or behaves between the two operating systems.
+
+The user mentioned kernel panic when trying to mount the rootfs, which suggests a problem during the boot process—perhaps related to how the virtual CD-ROM is presented or handled differently on Windows. This could point towards issues with device emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories again, 'boot' seems relevant because it's about the initial stages of the guest OS starting up. Alternatively, 'device' might also fit if the problem is with hardware emulation during boot. However, since the issue specifically occurs when mounting the rootfs, which is part of the boot process, I think 'boot' is more appropriate.
+
+I don't see any mention of assembly lowering or translation issues, so 'mistranslation' doesn't seem right. It's not about graphics, sockets, or network specifically unless those are involved in device emulation. But given the context, focusing on the boot process makes sense.
+</think>
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file