summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1216845
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1216845')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/121684523
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1216845 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1216845
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..844fd12a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/debug/1216845
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let's read through the details carefully.
+
+The user reports an issue with QEMU's ARM semihosting feature where it always calls exit(0), ignoring any non-zero return codes from their unit tests. They mention that they had to use a workaround by triggering an unsupported BKPT instruction to get a non-zero exit code, which isn't ideal.
+
+Looking at the problem, the user examined arm-semi.c and found that in the case of SYS_EXIT, the parameter is ignored. Their proposed solution involves modifying this behavior so that if the code is non-zero (or specific values), it should exit with that code instead of always exiting with 0.
+
+The categories given are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Let's think about what category fits best. The issue is related to how the semihosting API in QEMU handles exit codes for ARM targets. It's not a translation issue between source and target architectures because it's more about how the exit code is handled after execution. 
+
+The problem isn't with assembly lowering, so that rules out 'assembly'. The issue is specifically with semihosting behavior, which relates to debugging and control of the guest OS from the host, possibly under gdb.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'debug' seems relevant because it involves how exit codes are handled during execution, which ties into debugging functionality. Alternatively, could it be 'boot'? But that's more about starting the system rather than handling exits.
+
+Other possibilities: It's not a device or peripheral issue, nor is it performance-related. It's more about the interaction between the guest and the host, particularly during exit handling. This sounds like a debug scenario since exit codes are part of process termination signaling, which in QEMU would be managed through debugging interfaces like gdb.
+
+So, considering all this, the best category seems to be 'debug'.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to how QEMU handles exit codes during semihosting for ARM targets, specifically within the debugging context. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+**debug**
\ No newline at end of file