1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1110 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1110
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..acaecf120
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1110
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The task is to look at the title and any additional info provided and figure out which category it falls under.
+
+The bug report says: "Add vhost-user-gpu support for cross architecture emulation." Hmm, let's break that down. Vhost-user-gpu sounds like it relates to GPU virtualization, right? I remember that vhost is part of QEMU/KVM for handling device passthrough or offloading certain devices to the host. So vhost-user would be a userspace component for that.
+
+The title mentions adding support for cross architecture emulation. That means it's about running code from one architecture on another (like x86 to ARM or something). But in this case, it's specifically about GPU support, so it must relate to how QEMU handles GPU devices when emulating across different architectures.
+
+Looking at the additional info: the host is Android 12 with a Linux kernel. That tells me it's an environment where maybe they're running QEMU on Android, possibly for emulation or testing purposes. But I'm not sure if that affects the category; maybe just context.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided:
+
+- mistranslation
+- assembly: lowering
+- other
+- device
+- graphic
+- socket
+- network
+- KVM
+- boot
+- vnc
+- debug
+- files
+- permissions
+- performance
+- kernel
+- peripherals
+- hypervisor
+
+The key terms are "vhost-user-gpu" and "cross architecture". Vhost is related to KVM, as it's part of the virtualization stack. So maybe the category is 'hypervisor' since KVM is a hypervisor? Or perhaps 'device' because it's about device support.
+
+Wait, vhost-user-gpu is a specific feature for GPU passthrough in QEMU/KVM. Adding support implies that there's an issue or request related to how the GPU is handled during emulation across architectures. So it could be under 'peripherals' if it's about devices or 'hypervisor' since KVM is involved.
+
+But I'm not entirely sure. Let me think again: vhost-user-gpu relates to GPU virtualization, which is a device-related feature. So maybe 'device' is the category. Alternatively, since it's about hypervisor-level support for a specific device, perhaps 'hypervisor' fits better. But the main issue here is adding a feature related to cross-architecture emulation of GPUs using vhost-user-gpu, which could be under 'peripherals' as it's a hardware-related component.
+
+Wait, but looking at the list, there are categories like 'graphic', which would relate more directly to GPU issues. Since this is about GPU support in QEMU, maybe that's the category. But I'm not sure if 'graphic' is the right term here because vhost-user-gpu is a specific feature within device emulation.
+
+Alternatively, since it's about adding support for a device (GPU) in cross-architecture emulation, 'device' might be more accurate. Or perhaps 'hypervisor' because KVM is involved, and this is an enhancement to its capabilities.
+
+Hmm, I'm a bit torn between 'peripherals', 'device', and maybe even 'hypervisor'. But since the main focus is on adding GPU support, which is a device, but in the context of QEMU, which is part of the hypervisor layer. However, the category list has 'peripherals' as one option.
+
+Wait, the categories listed include 'peripherals', so that's likely for devices like GPUs, NICs, etc. So I think 'peripherals' would be the right category here because it's about adding support for a GPU device in QEMU/KVM.
+</think>
+
+device
\ No newline at end of file