diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1767200')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1767200 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1767200 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1767200 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ee2024806 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1767200 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU based on the given categories. The user provided an error message: "Kernel Panic Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(31,3)" and mentioned using QEMU with a specific setup involving an ARM kernel and a CD-ROM image. + +First, let me break down what's happening here. The error indicates that the kernel is unable to mount the root file system. This usually points to issues related to how the block devices are being handled during the boot process. The "unknown-block(31,3)" part suggests that the system doesn't recognize the device it's trying to access for the root filesystem. + +Now, looking at the categories provided: kernel, hypervisor, other, etc. I need to determine which one fits best. + +The error is occurring during the boot process, and since QEMU emulates hardware components, including storage devices, this issue likely relates to how QEMU presents block devices to the guest OS. The "kernel" category might seem relevant because it's a kernel panic, but the problem isn't with the kernel itself but rather with how the root filesystem is being accessed. + +The device category seems appropriate here because the issue involves a block device not being recognized correctly by the kernel, which in turn could be due to QEMU's emulation of that device. Alternatively, "other" might fit if it doesn't fall neatly into specific hardware categories, but considering it's about block devices and their recognition, "device" seems more precise. + +I'm also thinking that since the problem is with mounting the root filesystem on an unknown block device, it's likely related to how QEMU configures or presents storage devices. Therefore, classifying this under "device" makes sense because it pertains to hardware device emulation issues within QEMU. +</think> + +The bug report indicates a kernel panic due to an inability to mount the root file system on an unknown block device. Since this relates to the handling of block devices during boot, which is emulated by QEMU, the appropriate category is: + +device \ No newline at end of file |