diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/152 | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/1524546 | 15 |
2 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/152 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/152 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5c2517b76 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/152 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I have this bug report about QEMU where the "qemu-img compare -m option is missing." The task is to classify it into one of the given categories. Let me think through this step by step. + +First, I know that QEMU is a versatile tool used for emulation and virtualization. It has various components, including emulators, image utilities, network drivers, etc. The bug report mentions "qemu-img compare -m option is missing." + +I'm recalling what the "-m" option does in qemu-img compare. From what I remember, the "-m" stands for "missing," and it's used to compare images but only output the blocks that are present in one image but not the other. So this is a specific feature request or bug report related to the qemu-img utility. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others. + +Since the issue is about a missing command-line option in a tool (qemu-img), it's not related to translation issues or performance. It also doesn't pertain to devices, graphics, sockets, etc., because it's more of a feature availability problem rather than a hardware interaction. + +The category "files" might be relevant here since qemu-img deals with disk images, which are files. Alternatively, maybe it's under "other," but I should check the definitions again. + +Wait, "mistranslation" is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, which doesn't apply here. "Assembly lowering" relates to code generation in compilers or JITs, so that's not it either. + +The missing option is a feature of qemu-img, which handles disk images. So "files" seems appropriate because it's related to file operations and management within QEMU. + +Alternatively, if the category isn't explicitly listed under "files," perhaps "other" would be correct. But given that files are involved (disk images), I think "files" is a better fit. +</think> + +files \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/1524546 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/1524546 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e79ca483d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/1524546 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through the problem again. + +The user is reporting an issue with `qemu-img rebase`. When they try to link a disk image to a different backing file and the old backing file doesn't exist, the command fails. Instead of showing an error about the old backing file, it says the main file can't be opened. For example, when running `qemu-img rebase -b <backing_file> <filename>`, if `<backing_file>` is missing, it incorrectly displays "Could not open <filename>" instead of mentioning the backing file. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The issue here is about error messages related to file operations. The problem occurs during a file operation (`rebase`), and the error message points to the wrong file. This doesn't seem to be related to translation issues or assembly lowering. It's more about how the program handles files and reports errors. + +Since the bug is in the error reporting when dealing with backing files, which are part of the filesystem operations, the most appropriate category would likely be 'files'. Alternatively, it could also be considered under 'other' if none of the specific categories fit, but since it's directly related to file handling, 'files' seems more precise. + +Wait, checking the possible categories again: The user provided a list that includes 'file' as an option. Yes, I think 'files' is the correct category here because the bug is about how the files are being handled and the misleading error message regarding their existence. +</think> + +files \ No newline at end of file |