2 files changed, 54 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/162 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/162
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7da6afe40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/162
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "util/path.c/follow_path() does not handle '/' well". The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc. 
+
+First, let's understand what the bug is about. The file is util/path.c and the function is follow_path(). It doesn't handle "/" correctly. I know that in file systems, a single slash "/" typically refers to the root directory. So if follow_path() isn't handling this properly, it might be causing issues related to paths or file operations.
+
+Looking at the categories: device, network, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, etc. Since path handling is related to how files are accessed and managed, which falls under system calls and file management, I'm thinking it's more about the kernel or perhaps filesystem operations. But looking at the given categories, 'files' isn't listed; wait, no, actually, 'files' isn't in the options provided. Wait, let me check again.
+
+The user provided a list including "other" as one category and others like device, graphic, etc. So, since this bug is about path handling, which could be part of the kernel's filesystem operations or maybe it's a general file-related issue. Alternatively, if it's in QEMU, which emulates devices and hardware, perhaps it's related to how QEMU handles paths when managing virtual devices or storage.
+
+But wait, 'follow_path()' sounds like a function that resolves paths, possibly within the context of QEMU's device management. So maybe it's part of the device handling code. Alternatively, if it's about file operations in general, perhaps it's under 'kernel' since many system calls are handled by the kernel.
+
+Wait, but looking at the categories again: the options are mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+So 'files' is an option. Alternatively, if it's related to how QEMU handles paths when dealing with devices or storage, maybe it's under 'device' or 'peripherals'. But I'm not entirely sure. However, the function name 'follow_path()' seems more about filesystem operations rather than device management.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's a bug in how QEMU processes file paths for its own internal use, which could be part of the kernel emulation or system calls handled by QEMU as a hypervisor. But I'm not certain.
+
+Wait, another thought: if this function is part of handling paths within the context of virtual machines or devices, it might fall under 'hypervisor' since QEMU/KVM acts as a hypervisor. Or maybe it's part of the device emulation in QEMU, making it a 'device' issue.
+
+But I'm not sure. Since the bug is about path handling, which is a filesystem operation, and considering that in QEMU, such functions might be part of the kernel or system emulated by QEMU, perhaps it's under 'kernel'. Alternatively, if it's related to how devices are managed via paths, maybe 'device' is more appropriate.
+
+Wait, looking back at the list, 'files' isn't an option. Wait no, I see the options again: files is actually listed as one of them. So maybe 'files' is the category since it's about handling file paths incorrectly.
+
+But I'm not 100% confident. Alternatively, if the function is part of device management, perhaps it's under 'device'. But without more context, it's hard to say. However, given that the issue is with path handling, which is a filesystem-related task, I think 'files' makes sense.
+
+Wait, but in QEMU, maybe this function isn't directly about files but about device paths? Hmm. Alternatively, if it's part of the utility functions used by QEMU for file operations, then 'files' would be correct.
+
+I'm leaning towards 'other' because sometimes bugs that don't fit into specific categories fall under 'other', but I think 'files' is more accurate here since it's about path handling.
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions an issue with `follow_path()` not handling "/" correctly, which relates to file system operations. Since "files" is one of the categories provided, this seems appropriate.
+
+files
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/1626 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/1626
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5727bc535
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/files/1626
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report related to QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The issue is that QEMU defaults to using /var/tmp instead of /tmp for temporary files. The user points out that their sysadmins don't allow normal users to write to /var/tmp, which causes problems. They want an option to configure where QEMU uses for temp files, possibly via an environment variable or a ./configure option.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+I need to figure out which category best fits this bug. The problem is about where QEMU writes temporary files. This relates to file handling and directory permissions. So it's not directly about translation or assembly. It's more about how the system handles files and directories.
+
+The possible categories include 'files' and 'permissions'. Since the issue is about access rights (sysadmins have set restrictions on /var/tmp), it touches on permissions, but the main problem is that QEMU isn't using the desired directory at all. The user wants to change where QEMU writes temp files, which is more about file handling.
+
+Wait, but 'files' might not cover the permission aspect. Alternatively, maybe 'permissions' because it's about access rights. But the primary issue is the default directory selection by QEMU, so perhaps 'files' is more appropriate since it's about how QEMU manages its temporary files location.
+
+Another angle: The bug report suggests that QEMU changes the temp directory without allowing the user to configure it. This seems like a configuration or runtime option problem, which falls under 'files' because it's about file paths and directories.
+
+So I think the best category here is 'files'.
+</think>
+
+The issue revolves around QEMU's default temporary directory choice and the inability to configure it, which affects file handling and permissions. The primary concern is the location of temp files, making 'files' the appropriate category.
+
+files
\ No newline at end of file