diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/graphic/589231')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/graphic/589231 | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/graphic/589231 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/graphic/589231 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..754f523f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/graphic/589231 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user has provided a list of possible categories and wants me to choose the right one based on the given bug report. + +The bug report mentions that Cirrus VGA is very slow in qemu-kvm version 0.12. It points out that there was a regression between versions 0.11 and 0.12, causing significant slowdowns. They also mention that for Linux guests using the VESA driver, this becomes particularly problematic because it's already slow. + +Looking at the categories: Mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, etc. The issue here is about VGA emulation performance. Since Cirrus VGA is a graphics-related component in QEMU, and the problem affects how well it performs for guests (whether Windows or Linux), this seems related to the graphics handling within QEMU. + +I should consider if "graphic" is the correct category. Yes, because it's directly impacting the VGA emulator, which falls under graphic devices. Other options like "device" might be too broad since it could refer to any hardware device emulation, not specifically graphical. The problem isn't about network, sockets, or hypervisor issues but rather about the performance of a specific graphics component. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is "graphic." +</think> + +graphic \ No newline at end of file |