diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1217339')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1217339 | 23 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1217339 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1217339 deleted file mode 100644 index f93271c02..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1217339 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully. - -The user is talking about how when QEMU receives a SIGQUIT signal, it should first attempt to send an ACPI shutdown to the guest before ending the process. They mention that without access to the monitor or a wrapper like libvirt, there's no graceful way to shut down the guest. They also suggest using another signal like SIGUSR1 if SIGQUIT isn't suitable. - -So, what's happening here? It seems like QEMU is handling signals in a way that doesn't allow for a proper ACPI shutdown process. Instead of just terminating abruptly, it should trigger the guest OS to perform a graceful shutdown via ACPI before exiting. - -Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. - -I need to figure out which category fits best. The issue is about signal handling leading to guest shutdown via ACPI. This relates to how QEMU manages system-level operations, specifically power management of the virtual machine. - -ACPI in a VM context is typically handled by the hypervisor or emulator's management of hardware events. Since QEMU acts as a hypervisor for KVM or as an emulator for other targets, this would fall under the hypervisor category. Alternatively, it could be related to device handling if it's about how devices are managed, but ACPI shutdown is more of a system-level control. - -Wait, looking again, the categories don't have 'hypervisor' explicitly listed? Wait no, the categories do include 'hypervisor'. So yes, this is likely under hypervisor because it involves managing the guest OS's power state through QEMU's mechanisms, which would be part of its hypervisory functions. - -Alternatively, maybe it's about how signals are translated into actions within QEMU. But that might fall under 'mistranslation', but I'm not sure if that applies here. The issue isn't exactly a translation error between architectures or IR; it's more about signal handling and guest shutdown processes. - -So the main point is that when a certain signal (like SIGQUIT) is received, QEMU should initiate a proper shutdown via ACPI rather than crashing the VM abruptly. This relates to how the hypervisor manages guest operations, specifically power management. - -Therefore, the category should be 'hypervisor'. -</think> - -hypervisor \ No newline at end of file |