diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1675 | 15 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1675458 | 23 |
2 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1675 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1675 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..213a4def4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1675 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "virtual machines still randomly crashing on kernel 6.1.30". The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +First, the mention is about virtual machines crashing. QEMU is a hypervisor that runs VMs. So the issue relates to the hypervisor itself or how it's interacting with something else. The crash is happening on kernel 6.1.30, which suggests it's an issue with the host operating system's kernel. + +Looking at the categories: KVM is part of QEMU and related to virtualization; however, this bug mentions the kernel version, so it might be a problem in how QEMU interacts with the host kernel or vice versa. The hypervisor category seems appropriate because it's about VM crashes, which are managed by the hypervisor layer. + +Wait, but sometimes issues like this could also fall under 'kernel' if it's related to the host OS's handling of virtualization. But since the user is using QEMU/KVM for VMs, and the problem occurs on kernel 6.1.30, it might be a kernel issue that affects QEMU/KVM. However, another thought: perhaps the crash is within the hypervisor itself, which in this case is part of the kernel modules (like KVM). So 'hypervisor' could be the right category. + +Alternatively, if the bug report was about problems with how QEMU translates code or handles assembly during VM execution, it would be 'mistranslation' or 'assembly'. But since it's about crashing VMS on a specific kernel version, I think 'hypervisor' is more fitting because hypervisors manage virtual machines and interact closely with the host kernel. + +I'm leaning towards 'hypervisor' as the category here. +</think> + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1675458 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1675458 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..32501b5db --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1675458 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out which category this bug report falls into. Let's read through the problem carefully. + +The user is reporting an issue with KVM where when they attach a new interface to a live VM, after rebooting, the network interfaces' order changes unexpectedly. They gave an example where eth1 was supposed to have a certain MAC address but ended up changing after a reboot. This causes problems because their configuration files point to specific interface names. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is related to how interfaces are being handled after attaching and rebooting. Since this involves KVM virtual machines and their configuration via libvirt, it's likely a problem with the way KVM manages devices, specifically network interfaces. The user mentioned that when they add an interface using virsh, the order changes upon reboot, which suggests that the ordering or assignment of PCI slots isn't being handled correctly. + +The problem doesn't seem to be about translation issues (mistranslation) because it's not related to converting source code to IR or target. It also isn't about assembly lowering (assembly). It's more about how the hypervisor, in this case KVM, manages hardware devices and their order when the VM reboots. + +So, considering the categories, "network" is a possible fit because it's about network interfaces. However, since the issue arises from the hypervisor's management of these devices during reboot, it might be more accurately categorized under "hypervisor." + +Wait, but the user mentioned that they had to edit the .xml configuration file in KVM to fix the ordering. This points towards a problem with how the VM's hardware configuration is being managed by KVM itself, which would fall under the hypervisor category. + +Alternatively, it could be related to device assignment or management within the VM, so "device" might also fit. But since the issue is about network interfaces specifically and their ordering upon reboot in a KVM VM, I think "hypervisor" is more appropriate because it's the hypervisor's responsibility to maintain the correct hardware configuration. + +But looking back at the categories, there's both "network" and "hypervisor." The problem involves how interfaces are handled after attaching them, which affects their order upon reboot. This seems like a bug in KVM's handling of devices during VM startup, so it's more about the hypervisor's device management rather than general network functionality. + +Therefore, I think the correct category is "hypervisor." +</think> + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file |