diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1726394')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1726394 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1726394 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1726394 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fc3b49223 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1726394 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem again. + +The user is reporting an issue with prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, address) in qemu-user. They mention that passing this command unmodified causes EFAULT because the third argument is an address to a BPF filter which is architecture-specific. So QEMU can't just rewrite these addresses and should return an error instead. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug is related to how QEMU handles system calls, specifically prctl with SECCOMP. Seccomp is a Linux kernel feature for sandboxing processes by filtering syscalls. Since this involves system call handling and the issue is about how QEMU passes or modifies certain parameters, I'm thinking it's not directly about translation errors (mistranslation) or assembly lowering. + +The problem seems to be in the way QEMU interacts with the host kernel's seccomp mechanism. Prctl is a system call used for process control, and SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER involves setting up BPF filters. If QEMU doesn't properly handle this because it's architecture-specific, it might be related to how the hypervisor (QEMU in this case) manages guest processes. + +Alternatively, since seccomp is part of the kernel's security features, maybe it falls under 'kernel' category, but I'm not certain. However, considering that QEMU acts as a hypervisor for KVM or other virtualization scenarios, and this issue affects how it handles certain system calls within the guest OS, it might be more related to the hypervisor's role in managing such features. + +I'm leaning towards 'hypervisor' because the problem is about how QEMU (as a hypervisor) interacts with seccomp filters, which are part of the guest's environment. The error occurs when passing an address that's not properly handled across architectures, and the solution involves returning an appropriate error code to prevent incorrect behavior. + +So I think 'hypervisor' is the most fitting category for this bug. +</think> + +hypervisor \ No newline at end of file |