2 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/196 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/196
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..601132132
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/196
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Improve UX for macOS when launching from a fullscreen app". The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, let's break down the bug report. It's about improving user experience (UX) on macOS when launching from a fullscreen app. So the issue is related to how QEMU behaves or feels when starting up within an application that's running in full-screen mode on macOS.
+
+Looking at the categories, I'm trying to see which one fits best. Let's go through them:
+
+- Mistranslation: This would be about incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target. Doesn't seem relevant here.
+- Assembly: Lowering assembly code. Not related to UX or fullscreen issues.
+- Other: A catch-all category, but maybe not the most specific.
+- Device: Could relate to hardware devices, but this is more about UI/UX.
+- Graphic: Maybe, since fullscreen mode involves graphics, but it's more about user interaction rather than rendering or display issues.
+- Socket/network: Not related.
+- KVM: Kernel-based virtual machine; maybe not directly relevant unless it's a hypervisor issue.
+- Boot: Possibly, as launching might relate to booting a VM, but the focus is on UX in macOS when starting from fullscreen.
+- VNC: Remote desktop, not directly related here.
+- Debug: Not about debugging features.
+- Files/permissions: No mention of files or access issues.
+- Performance: Maybe, if launching takes too long, but the report is about UX improvement, which could include performance but isn't solely that.
+- Kernel: Probably not unless it's a kernel module issue.
+- Peripherals: Devices connected to the VM; doesn't fit here.
+- Hypervisor: QEMU acts as a hypervisor, so this might be relevant because it's about how the hypervisor interacts with the host OS (macOS) in fullscreen mode.
+
+The bug is about user experience when launching an application within a fullscreen context on macOS. Since QEMU runs as a hypervisor, and this issue pertains to its behavior within that environment, the most appropriate category seems to be "hypervisor". It's not directly about performance or graphics but rather how the hypervisor handles fullscreen launches in macOS.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1967814 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1967814
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..625d4a443
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1967814
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's break it down step by step.
+
+First, the problem occurs in an Ubuntu 20.04.3 environment with virtio-scsi devices on a KVM guest. The issue is that during disk tests, when there's a failed path, the guest experiences miscompares. That suggests something is wrong with how SCSI commands are being handled between the host and guest.
+
+Looking at the comment by Halil Pasic, he mentions that prior to a specific commit (a108557bbf), QEMU wasn't building sense data correctly based on the host's SCSI status. This caused the guest to think a command succeeded even when it actually failed. He points out that this leads to corruptions in the guest's view of the storage.
+
+The key here is understanding what part of QEMU is involved. Virtio-scsi implies that it's related to the VirtIO SCSI driver, which is part of QEMU/KVM for virtualized SCSI devices. The problem arises from how sense data is generated and passed back when a command fails. This falls under the handling of SCSI commands within the hypervisor or QEMU itself.
+
+The commit referenced (a108557bbf) seems to be about inlining sg_io_sense_from_errno() into callers, which suggests it's modifying how sense data is built from error information. This indicates a change in how QEMU constructs and handles SCSI command responses, particularly when dealing with host-level errors.
+
+The comment also mentions that this doesn't fault the guest kernel or multipath components but points to an issue within QEMU's handling of SCSI commands on the host side. The proposed fix is through backporting patches, which are changes made to older versions of software (in this case, likely backporting a newer QEMU feature to an older release).
+
+Now, considering the categories provided: hypervisor seems like the most fitting since KVM is a hypervisor, and this issue relates to how QEMU, as part of the hypervisor stack, handles SCSI commands and their responses. The other categories like network, socket, or device (maybe storage devices) are relevant but not as precise as hypervisor.
+
+Therefore, the bug report is primarily about an issue within the hypervisor's handling of SCSI operations, specifically in QEMU's VirtIO-scsi implementation.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file