1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1851939 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1851939
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c7a2c725a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1851939
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's read through it carefully.
+
+The issue is about the RISC-V mstatus TSR bit not being correctly implemented in QEMU. The user says that since version 4.1.0, the TSR bit is supported, but executing sret in M-mode doesn't work as intended.
+
+Looking at the RISC-V spec provided, when TSR=1, attempting to execute SRET in S-mode raises an illegal instruction exception, but it should be allowed in M-mode. So the problem is that QEMU is incorrectly raising exceptions even when running in M-mode.
+
+The suggested fix changes a condition in op_helper.c. The original code checks if priv_ver >= 1.10 and if mstatus.TSR is set. It doesn't consider the current privilege mode, leading to exceptions being raised in M-mode when they shouldn't.
+
+So the bug is related to how QEMU handles the execution of SRET based on the TSR bit and the current privilege level. The misclassification comes from not checking whether it's running in S-mode or M-mode correctly.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: mistranslation refers to incorrect semantic mapping between source and target architectures, often in user-mode assembly lowering. This seems like an issue with how QEMU handles RISC-V instructions (assembly lowering), so I think 'mistranslation' fits because it's about the semantics of the instruction execution.
+</think>
+
+The bug involves incorrect handling of the mstatus TSR bit affecting the SRET instruction, which relates to how QEMU translates and executes RISC-V instructions. 
+
+**mistranslation**
\ No newline at end of file