diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1927530')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1927530 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1927530 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1927530 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b4000bb49 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/1927530 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure out what category this bug report falls into. The user is experiencing issues with QEMU when running a test case that uses HWAddressSanitizer. Specifically, it's failing to report a tag mismatch and instead throws a SEGV error. + +First, the user mentioned using QEMU version 6.0 as a simulator for AArch64. They provided details about the test case and the output they received. The key here is that the expected behavior was a "tag-mismatch" error, but instead, it's getting a segmentation violation (SEGV). + +Now, looking at the possible categories: Mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, VNC, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The issue seems to be related to how QEMU is handling memory addresses or perhaps how it's translating instructions. Since the problem occurs during execution under QEMU, it might not be a direct bug in the host kernel but something within QEMU itself. + +HWAddressSanitizer is part of GCC for hardware-assisted address sanitization, which checks for buffer overflows and invalid memory accesses. The fact that it's not reporting the correct error suggests there might be an issue with how QEMU emulates certain instructions or the memory management in the emulator. + +Since the user provided a test case where the expected output is a tag mismatch but instead gets a SEGV, this could point to an incorrect translation of instructions from AArch64 to the target architecture (probably x86 if running on that host). If QEMU isn't correctly translating the memory access checks or the way it handles exceptions, it might lead to the wrong error being reported. + +Looking at the possible categories again, "mistranslation" seems to fit because it's about incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture (AArch64) to the target (probably x86). The bug is causing QEMU to misbehave in how it handles memory accesses during emulation, leading to an unexpected SEGV instead of a tag mismatch. + +Other categories like "network" or "graphic" don't seem relevant here since the issue is about memory access and error reporting. Similarly, "device" or "peripherals" aren't directly related unless it's a hardware device emulation problem, which doesn't appear to be the case. + +Therefore, categorizing this as "mistranslation" makes sense because it's likely an issue in how QEMU translates AArch64 instructions and their memory semantics during emulation. +</think> + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |