diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/2737')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/2737 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/2737 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/2737 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8137d1e08 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/2737 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The query is asking about plans to add RISC-V Vector (RVV) backend support. Hmm, RVV refers to vector extensions in RISC-V architecture, which are used for SIMD operations. + +Looking at the possible categories, "mistranslation" seems related to how source code is translated into IR or target code. Adding a new backend would involve modifying the translation process to handle RISC-V vectors correctly. This sounds like an assembly lowering task because it's about translating higher-level instructions into machine code with vector support. + +Other categories don't seem to fit as well. It's not about device drivers, graphics, sockets, or network issues. Kernel and hypervisor are more about system-level stuff, but this is specifically about the instruction set architecture and translation. So "mistranslation" or "assembly" could be options, but since it's about adding a new backend, which involves lowering assembly code, "assembly" might be more precise. + +Wait, no—actually, the category "mistranslation" refers to incorrect mappings during translation. If they're planning to add support, maybe there are issues with how RVV instructions are being translated now or in the future. So perhaps it's under "mistranslation". + +But I'm a bit confused. The report isn't about a bug per se but a feature request. However, since the user provided possible categories that include things like 'other', maybe 'other' is appropriate if none fit. Alternatively, "assembly" because it relates to lowering assembly code for RVV. + +Wait, looking again at the categories: mistranslation is about incorrect mapping during translation; adding a backend might involve fixing or implementing correct mappings. So perhaps it's under 'mistranslation'. Or maybe it's a new feature, so 'other'? + +I think the best fit is "mistranslation" because it relates to how instructions are handled in the translation process, which would be part of adding RVV support. +</think> + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |