diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
6 files changed, 99 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/109 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/109 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4f2f7eb36 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/109 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "Make Uninstall Rule Requested". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +First, the title mentions an "Uninstall Rule", which sounds like it's related to build or makefile rules in QEMU. Since this is part of QEMU development, maybe it's about how Makefiles are set up. Uninstall typically refers to removing installed files, but in a project context, it might be about build instructions. + +Looking at the categories: "other" covers things that don't fit into specific other areas. "files" could relate, but "uninstall rule" is more about the build process rather than file permissions or operations. The user wants to make sure the uninstall target is correctly requested, which points towards build configuration or Makefile setup. + +The categories listed don't have a specific one for build systems or Makefiles. So, it's probably best categorized under "other". +</think> + +other \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1090837 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1090837 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bd49cf47d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1090837 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is having trouble building QEMU-1.3.0 on Solaris 10 using a SPARC processor. They encountered several errors during the configure step, specifically issues with substitution, exclamation marks not found, and curl-config not being found. + +The user also mentioned that there's another bug report linked (bug #636315) where it was noted that "sh" is hard-coded in the script. They're suggesting modifying the script to accept a $SHELL argument so they can use bash or another shell during configure and make steps. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue here isn't related to any of the specific components like networking or graphics. The problem arises during the build process, specifically when running the configure script. The errors indicate problems with how the shell is handling certain commands and substitutions. The user is pointing out that the script uses a hard-coded shell (probably /bin/sh) which might not be available or suitable on their system (Solaris 10). + +This seems to be an issue related to how the build scripts are written, specifically in how they invoke the shell. It's not about translations between architectures or assembly code. Instead, it's about the environment setup during compilation—specifically, ensuring that the correct shell is used. Since the problem isn't directly tied to any of the listed specific categories like KVM or network, but rather to the build process and shell configuration, "other" seems like the most fitting category. +</think> + +The bug report discusses issues encountered while building QEMU on Solaris 10 due to problems in the configure script. The errors suggest issues with shell substitutions and missing commands. The user refers to a known issue where "sh" is hard-coded, making it difficult to use another shell like bash. This problem isn't related to specific components like networking or graphics but pertains to build process configuration and shell usage. + +**Answer:** other \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1094786 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1094786 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..59c1013ba --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1094786 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description carefully. + +The user is reporting an issue with a static build of QEMU that includes the curses feature. When they run `configure` with `--enable-curses --static`, it fails because the configure script can't find the required libraries, specifically `-ltinfo`. Without this flag, the build process aborts, but adding `-ltinfo` manually allows the check to succeed. + +Then, during compilation, there are linker errors related to undefined references like `COLS`, `LINES`, `stdscr`, and `curs_set`. These symbols are part of the ncurses library. The user also mentions that they tried a minimal build with various disables, but the issue persists. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The main problem here is that the static build isn't linking against `-ltinfo` properly, leading to missing symbols from ncurses. This seems to be a linking issue rather than a problem with QEMU's own code or features. Since it's about library linkage and not any specific component like networking or KVM, the most appropriate category would be 'other'. The issue isn't tied directly to any of the listed specific areas but is more about build configuration. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where a static build of QEMU with curses fails due to missing libraries (-ltinfo) and undefined references in ncurses. This relates to linking issues rather than specific QEMU components, so it falls under 'other'. + +**Answer:** other \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1094950 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1094950 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d9b51e9d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1094950 @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me go through the details step by step. + +The user provided a crash report on MacOS 10.8.2 using QEMU version 1.3.0. They tried different images and configurations without success. The error message shows a crash at `qemu_iohandler_poll` in `iohandler.c:124`. + +Looking at the backtrace, it starts with an EXC_BAD_ACCESS due to KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE. This suggests a memory access issue, possibly related to how pointers or memory management is handled. + +In the GDB output, when they look at the `ioh` structure, `fd_read` points to `sigfd_handler`, and `opaque` is set to 0x3. The crash happens on line 124 where it calls `ioh->fd_read(ioh->opaque);`. + +Since this involves the I/O handler and a memory protection issue, it's likely related to how file descriptors or I/O operations are being handled. The function `qemu_iohandler_poll` is part of QEMU's I/O handling mechanism. + +Considering the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc., this seems most closely related to I/O operations. While it could be under 'device' if it's a hardware device issue, but since it's about file descriptors and I/O handlers, 'socket' or 'network' might also be possible. However, the specific function is more about general I/O handling rather than networking. + +Wait, looking again, the categories include 'other', which is a catch-all. But in this case, the issue is within QEMU's I/O handler code, which is part of the core functionality. It doesn't fit into device, graphic, or network specifically unless it's tied to those areas, but the error is more about memory access during I/O handling. + +But since the crash is at `qemu_iohandler_poll`, which is related to how QEMU manages its I/O events and file descriptors, perhaps 'other' isn't the right category. Alternatively, maybe 'device' because it's part of device emulation or the way devices are handled in QEMU. + +Wait, no, device usually refers to emulated hardware devices, but this crash is in the I/O handler code which manages event loops and such. So maybe it's more about the main loop or event handling rather than a specific device. + +Looking at the list again: categories include 'other', 'device', 'graphic', 'socket', etc. Since the issue is within the I/O handlers, perhaps 'socket' isn't precise enough because this could be any type of file descriptor, not necessarily sockets. + +Alternatively, maybe it's part of the main loop or event handling, which might fall under 'other'. But in QEMU's context, I/O handlers are crucial for device emulation and networking. So perhaps 'device' is more appropriate as the bug affects the I/O handling which is tied to device operations. + +Wait, but 'device' would imply a hardware device issue, while this crash is about an invalid memory access during I/O handling. It might not be directly related to a specific device but rather how QEMU manages its own I/O operations. + +In that case, perhaps the most appropriate category is 'other', as it's a bug in the core I/O handling code without fitting neatly into the other more specific categories like network or socket. +</think> + +The crash occurs within the `qemu_iohandler_poll` function, which is part of QEMU's I/O handling mechanism. Since this involves an issue with memory access during I/O operations and doesn't specifically fit into categories like device, network, or others, it falls under 'other'. + +**Answer:** + +other \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1095 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1095 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..291d263fe --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1095 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report as part of QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug report starts with "[QUESTION] What IF....", which doesn't provide specific technical details. Since there's no mention of any specific component or issue related to the categories listed, it's unclear where this falls. It might be a general question rather than an actual bug report. Therefore, the most appropriate category is "other". +</think> + +other \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1096 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1096 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..33e4223de --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1096 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report: "New warning with GCC 13". The categories provided are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +First, I'll break down the bug report. It mentions a new warning occurring with GCC 13. GCC stands for GNU Compiler Collection, which includes compilers like gcc. A "warning" here likely refers to a message generated during compilation, possibly about some code that might be problematic but isn't necessarily an error. + +Now, looking at the categories, I need to determine where this fits. The possible areas are related to different parts of QEMU: from user-mode issues (mistranslation, assembly) to more system-level components like hypervisor or kernel. + +The bug is about a warning with GCC 13. Since it's a compiler warning, it doesn't fit into any of the specific hardware-related categories like device, graphic, network, etc., because those would involve specific hardware interactions. Similarly, it's not related to virtualization features like KVM or hypervisor directly. + +Looking at the options, "other" is a catch-all category for bugs that don't fall into more specific areas. Since this warning is likely about code compilation and not a direct issue with QEMU's target architectures, device handling, or performance, it probably doesn't fit into mistranslation or assembly specifically either. Those categories would be more about how source code is translated or lowered to assembly. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category seems to be "other" because it's a general warning from the compiler and not tied to any specific QEMU component listed. +</think> + +The bug report mentions a new warning with GCC 13, which relates to the compilation process rather than specific hardware or system components. Since this isn't directly tied to any of the provided categories like device, network, or hypervisor, it falls under the general "other" category. + +**Answer:** +other \ No newline at end of file |