diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1178107')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1178107 | 35 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1178107 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1178107 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8321c5012 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1178107 @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The issue described is that when using `qemu-system-*.exe` with `-cpu ?` or `-M ?`, it exits silently on Windows, whereas on Linux it works correctly and lists available CPUs. + +First, let me understand what's happening here. The user is trying to get a list of supported CPUs by passing `-cpu ?` to QEMU on Windows. However, instead of getting the expected output, the command runs without any error message, but no CPU list appears either. On Linux, the same command works as intended. + +I know that in QEMU, options like `-cpu` and `-M` are used to specify the CPU model and machine type respectively. When you use a question mark with these options, it should display the available choices for that category. For example, `-cpu ?` lists all supported CPUs, while `-M ?` does the same for machine types. + +The fact that this works on Linux but not on Windows suggests there might be an issue specific to how QEMU handles command-line arguments or outputs on Windows. The user mentioned that the exit code is 0, which implies no error was returned by QEMU itself—so perhaps the problem isn't in the execution of the commands but rather in how the output is being handled. + +I'm thinking about what could cause this behavior. One possibility is a bug in how the Windows version of QEMU handles command-line parsing for these specific options. Maybe there's an issue with how it generates or displays the help information when queried with `?`. + +Looking at the possible categories, I have to choose one that fits best. The options are: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue seems related to how QEMU is responding to command-line arguments, specifically the `?` parameter for `-cpu`. This isn't about translation issues or assembly lowering. It's more about how QEMU handles these specific options in its command line processing. + +I recall that some of these categories are broader than others. "device" might be related if it's a hardware issue, but this seems software-related. "kernel" could be relevant since it's part of the OS interaction, but again, the problem is more about QEMU's behavior. + +Wait, looking at the list, there isn't an exact match for command-line argument handling or output behavior. However, I should see if any category indirectly relates to this. Since the bug affects how information is displayed when using certain options, it might be related to debugging or how QEMU outputs debug information. But the user didn't mention any debug flags being set. + +Alternatively, perhaps the problem lies in how the Windows build of QEMU handles stdout or stderr. If QEMU on Windows isn't outputting anything because it's not configured to display such messages, that could be a reason. But I'm not sure if that falls under any specific category like "debug" since debug is more about logging during development. + +Another thought: Maybe this is related to how the command-line options are implemented in QEMU's codebase. If there's an issue with the way the CPU types or machine types are being listed, it might be a bug in the option handling code itself, which could fall under "other" since it doesn't fit into any of the more specific categories. + +Wait, "mistranslation" refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target. That doesn't seem right here because the issue isn't about incorrect translations but rather missing output. + +Looking at all options again: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +I don't see any category that directly relates to command-line argument handling or output behavior. However, since the problem is about QEMU not providing expected information when queried with `-cpu ?`, it's a functional issue in how QEMU processes these commands. + +Perhaps "other" would be the most appropriate category here because none of the more specific categories fit this particular bug. It's not related to device drivers, graphics, networking, or any of the other listed areas. Therefore, classifying it under "other" makes sense as it doesn't fall into a predefined category. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where QEMU exits silently when using `-cpu ?` on Windows but works correctly on Linux. This is related to how command-line arguments are handled and outputted, which doesn't fit into any specific category like device or network. Therefore, the appropriate classification is: + +other \ No newline at end of file |