diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1356916')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1356916 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1356916 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1356916 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b8c328d34 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1356916 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned that there's a problem with QEMU related to the argv limit being too small. They explained that modern kernels don't have a fixed argv/environ limit anymore, but QEMU's user-space emulation still uses a fixed one. This causes execve failures in cases where it shouldn't. + +So, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is about argv limit during execution. Since QEMU's user-space emulation has a fixed limit and this affects the execve system call, it seems related to how the emulator handles system calls or the environment in which programs run under QEMU. + +Thinking about the categories, "execve" relates to process creation and argument passing. However, looking at the list, there isn't an explicit category for system calls. The closest might be 'boot' since execve is involved in executing commands during boot or runtime processes. Alternatively, it could fall under 'files' if it's about handling arguments as part of file execution. + +But considering that this issue is about resource limits and how QEMU emulates them compared to the host system, it might not fit into the standard categories directly. 'Other' seems like a possible category since none of the specific ones quite match. However, another angle is performance because the limit affects the number of arguments processed, which could impact performance when many are used. + +Wait, but the problem isn't about speed or resources being used too much; it's more about incorrect emulation leading to failure in cases that should succeed on a real system. This points towards an issue with how QEMU translates or emulates certain system calls. So 'mistranslation' might be appropriate because it's about the incorrect mapping from the source (user-mode) to the target (emulated environment). + +Wait, but 'mistranslation' is defined for user-mode assembly lowering issues. This seems more related to resource limits in the emulator rather than assembly translation. So maybe 'other' is still better. + +Alternatively, perhaps it's a problem with how QEMU handles device-related resources or kernel interactions, but I'm not entirely sure. Since none of the specific categories directly address argument lists or resource limits, 'other' might be the safest choice. +</think> + +The issue relates to QEMU's user-space emulation incorrectly handling argv limits, which affects execve behavior. This doesn't fit into the more specific categories like assembly or system calls but is a broader emulation issue. + +Answer: other \ No newline at end of file |