diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
4 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/160 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/160 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7d5e186c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/160 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Record/replay example does not work." The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +First, let me understand what the bug is about. Record/replay in QEMU usually refers to a feature that allows capturing and replaying of guest machine operations. This is often used for debugging or testing purposes. + +Now, looking at the categories: + +- Mistranslation: relates to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, which might cause issues when running code. But if the record/replay isn't working, it's not necessarily about translation errors unless specific to that. + +- Assembly: lowering assembly code. Unlikely related unless the issue is in how assembly is being handled during recording or replaying. + +- Other: a general category for bugs that don't fit elsewhere. + +The other categories like device, graphic, etc., are more specific to particular components or features of QEMU. + +Since record/replay isn't tied directly to any specific component listed (like network, KVM, vnc), and it's not about performance or debugging tools per se. It might be a problem with how the feature itself is implemented, which could fall under 'other' because it doesn't fit into the more specific categories. + +So, I think 'other' would be the appropriate category here. +</think> + +The bug report regarding the non-functioning record/replay example in QEMU does not specifically align with any of the listed specialized categories such as network or hypervisor. It's more about a feature malfunction rather than a component-specific issue, making 'other' the suitable classification. + +**Answer:** other \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1600681 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1600681 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b7e6070ee --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1600681 @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the report carefully. + +The user is having trouble with QEMU's mips64 usermode not running on a 32-bit i686 host. They're using Yocto version 2.1 or 2.2, QEMU 2.5 or 2.6, and gobject-introspection 1.46 or 1.48. The host OS is either Fedora 23 or Debian 8, both i686. + +The steps they took were setting MACHINE to "qemumips64" and running bitbake for gobject-introspection. They encountered errors during compilation, specifically when trying to build the GIR files. The error messages mention an address overflow when loading ELF binaries, which suggests some kind of memory issue or maybe a problem with how libraries are being loaded. + +They provided a link to a Yocto bug report, which probably has more details but isn't accessible here. They also attached the full compile log, so that might have more context. + +Now, looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The issue is about running QEMU-mips64 on a 32-bit host. Since mips64 is a 64-bit architecture, trying to run it on an i686 (which is 32-bit) might be causing problems. The usermode part suggests that this isn't KVM or full virtualization but rather a user-mode emulation. + +The error messages are about ELF binary loading and address overflow, which points towards issues with how binaries are being executed or loaded in the environment. This could relate to the way QEMU handles different architectures, particularly when emulating 64-bit on a 32-bit host. + +Looking at the categories again: 'mistranslation' is about incorrect mapping from source to target, which might be relevant if the binary isn't being translated correctly for the host's architecture. However, in this case, it seems more like an issue with running a 64-bit QEMU on a 32-bit system, which could be a limitation or bug in how QEMU is built or runs on such hosts. + +Another possibility is 'other' since the error isn't directly tied to one of the specific categories like graphics or network. But I should check if any category better fits. The problem seems related to the host's architecture limitations rather than something specific like a device or hypervisor issue. + +Wait, maybe 'device'? No, that's more about hardware devices. 'graphic' is probably not it since there's no mention of display issues. 'network' doesn't seem relevant either. + +So considering all this, the bug is likely due to running a 64-bit QEMU binary on a 32-bit host, which might be an architectural mismatch. Since the usermode QEMU might require certain features that aren't available in 32-bit, and the error is about address overflow (which could relate to 64-bit vs 32-bit pointer handling), this points towards a limitation or bug in how QEMU handles architecture differences. + +However, looking at the categories again, 'other' seems like the most fitting because it's not clearly one of the specific ones listed. Alternatively, if the issue is related to binary compatibility and translation between architectures, maybe 'mistranslation' would fit. But I'm not entirely sure. + +Wait, 'mistranslation' is more about incorrect mapping during compilation or execution, which could cause runtime errors like this. The error occurs when trying to load an ELF binary, which suggests a problem with how the executable is being handled by QEMU on the host system. + +Given that, perhaps it's better categorized under 'other' since it doesn't neatly fit into one of the specific categories provided. +</think> + +The bug report indicates issues running a 64-bit QEMU-MIPS64 on a 32-bit host. The error suggests an architectural mismatch or limitations in handling 64-bit binaries on a 32-bit system, which isn't explicitly covered by any specific category except 'other'. + +Answer: other \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1602 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1602 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..853e25e21 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1602 @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +<think> +Okay, let me try to figure this out. The user is asking to classify a bug report from QEMU into one of several categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +Looking at the bug report provided, it says that GitHub's QEMU repository has been out of sync with GitLab since March 23, 2023. The description mentions this issue between two repositories and provides steps to reproduce by visiting the GitHub link. There's no additional information given beyond that. + +I need to determine which category best fits this bug report. Let me go through each option: + +- **mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode. Doesn't seem relevant here. +- **assembly lowering**: Concerns converting high-level code to assembly, not applicable. +- **other**: A catch-all category for issues that don't fit elsewhere. +- **device**: Hardware device-related bugs; doesn't match. +- **graphic**: Issues with graphics rendering; no mention of that. +- **socket**: Network socket problems; not related. +- **network**: Networking issues; the problem isn't about network functionality. +- **KVM**: Kernel-based Virtual Machine hypervisor; the issue is about repository sync, not virtualization. +- **boot**: Booting issues; irrelevant here. +- **vnc**: VNC server/client problems; no connection. +- **debug**: Debugging tools or logs; not related to syncing repositories. +- **files**: File handling bugs; this is more about version control, so maybe, but perhaps too indirect. +- **permissions**: Access permissions; the issue is synchronization between repos, not access rights. +- **performance**: Performance issues; doesn't apply. +- **kernel**: Kernel-related; QEMU interacts with kernels but this isn't a kernel bug. +- **peripherals**: Hardware peripherals support; no relevance here. +- **hypervisor**: Hypervisor functions; again, the issue is about repository sync, not virtualization. + +The problem described is that two repositories are out of sync. This doesn't fit any specific category like device, network, or hypervisor. It's more related to version control and project management rather than a technical bug within QEMU itself. Therefore, the most appropriate category would be **other**, as it doesn't fall into any of the other defined categories. +</think> + +other \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1604 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1604 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..96a42b950 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1604 @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify the given bug report into one of the predefined categories for QEMU. Let's go through the details step by step. + +The user reported an issue where two Cortex-M7 CPUs are causing problems when loading their ROMs. Specifically, CPU1 is loading the ROM intended for CPU0 because it doesn't check the address space correctly. + +Looking at the code snippet provided, there's a function `rom_ptr_for_as` which seems to be responsible for finding the correct ROM based on the address space. The comment in the code mentions that they don't check whether the AddressSpace (as) matches the one associated with the ROM blob. This mismatch leads CPU1 to use CPU0's ROM, causing an assertion failure when it tries to use the stack. + +The user tried a fix by adding a new function `rom_ptr_wit_as` which includes address space checking, but they're not sure if this is the right approach. + +Now, considering the categories: Mistranslation refers to incorrect semantic mappings between source and target architectures. Here, the problem isn't directly about translation but rather about resource allocation (ROMs) across different CPUs with their own address spaces. + +The issue arises because the ROM loading function doesn't correctly associate each CPU's ROM with its specific address space, leading to cross-contamination. This seems more related to how resources are being managed and assigned between multiple CPUs in the system. + +Looking at other categories: It's not an assembly lowering issue (so not 'assembly'). The problem is about resource allocation across different CPUs, which falls under peripherals or perhaps device-related issues since it's about correctly assigning ROMs to each CPU. + +But considering that the root cause is incorrect resource mapping due to missing address space checks, it doesn't fit into standard categories like network, graphic, etc. However, 'mistranslation' might be a stretch because it's more about resource management than semantic translation. + +Wait, but 'other' is an option, and sometimes issues that don't neatly fit into the given categories fall under this. Alternatively, since it's related to how different CPUs (which are peripherals) are being handled, maybe 'peripherals' could be a category. But I'm not sure if that's accurate. + +Alternatively, perhaps 'mistranslation' isn't the right term here. Maybe the issue is in the device or CPU handling, but since the categories include 'other', and this doesn't fit neatly into others like kernel, hypervisor, etc., maybe 'other' is more appropriate. + +Wait, looking back at the problem description: The function `rom_ptr_for_as` is part of the code that loads ROMs. It seems to be about how the address space is being handled during ROM loading. So it's a resource allocation issue in the code, which could be seen as a bug in how the AddressSpace is checked when loading ROMs. + +The user tried adding a function to include address space checking, which suggests that the problem is indeed with the current method not properly considering the address space, leading to incorrect ROM assignment. This seems like a functional error rather than a translation or assembly issue. + +Given all this, I think 'mistranslation' might not be the correct category. It's more about resource management across multiple CPUs, which could fall under 'other' since it's a system-level bug in how resources are being assigned and checked. +</think> + +The bug report involves an incorrect handling of address spaces when loading ROMs for two CPUs, leading to one CPU using another's ROM. This is a system-level issue in resource management rather than semantic translation. + +Answer: other \ No newline at end of file |