2 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1656 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1656
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2b0f05a05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1656
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU. The issue is that the TLS certificate for the QEMU wiki has expired. Let me think through how to categorize this.
+
+First, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is with a TLS certificate expiration on the QEMU wiki's HTTPS site. So this relates to how secure connections are handled. TLS certificates are part of network security.
+
+Now, I should consider which category fits best. The bug isn't related to user-mode issues, assembly code, or anything directly tied to device drivers, graphics, sockets, or other listed areas like KVM, boot, VNC, etc. It's more about the secure connection and the validity period of the certificate.
+
+In QEMU, network-related bugs would fall under the 'network' category. However, this isn't a bug in how QEMU handles networking but rather an issue with its own web resources (the wiki). So it might be better classified under 'other' because it's not directly part of QEMU's core functionalities but relates to its online assets.
+
+Alternatively, since it's about secure connections, maybe 'network' is the right place. But I'm leaning towards 'other' because the certificate issue isn't a problem with how QEMU operates as a hypervisor or handles network traffic but rather an external resource's configuration.
+</think>
+
+The bug report pertains to an expired TLS certificate on an external website (the QEMU wiki), which is not directly related to QEMU's core functionalities but affects its online resources. Therefore, the most appropriate category is:
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1656676 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1656676
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5f1df7163
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1656676
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the information carefully.
+
+The bug report mentions an issue with 'read' being possibly uninitialized in a function called fw_cfg_dma_transfer within hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c. The warning is caught by GCC version 6.3.1, and it's present in the master branch on GitHub. 
+
+Looking at the code snippet provided:
+
+if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ) {
+    read = 1;
+} else if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_SKIP) {
+    read = 0;
+} else {
+    dma.length = 0;
+}
+
+The error is that 'read' might be used without being initialized. So, the function doesn't assign a value to 'read' in all possible code paths. Specifically, the else clause only sets dma.length but doesn't touch 'read'. This means if neither of the first two conditions is met, 'read' remains uninitialized and could cause issues when it's later used.
+
+The user suggested fixing this by initializing 'read' properly either at definition or in the else block. They're unsure whether to assign 1 or 0 there.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+This bug is related to uninitialized variables in a C file. It's about proper initialization, which falls under coding standards and static analysis warnings. Since it's not related to any specific hardware component like device or network, nor does it pertain to system calls or permissions. It doesn't seem to be performance-related either.
+
+The 'other' category is for issues that don't fit into the other more specific categories. This seems like a code quality issue rather than something directly tied to QEMU's main functionalities like networking or hypervisor features.
+
+So, I think the appropriate classification here is 'other'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an uninitialized variable warning in a C file within QEMU. Since it doesn't fall under any specific hardware component or system feature, but relates to code quality and static analysis, the correct category is:
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file