1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1911216 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1911216
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c57ac5b41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/peripherals/1911216
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's see what information we have here.
+
+The bug report mentions an assertion failure in hw/usb/hcd-ohci.c:1297, specifically at the function ohci_frame_boundary. The user provided a backtrace which shows that the program aborted due to this issue. 
+
+Looking at the categories, I need to figure out what part of QEMU is affected here. The file hcd-ohci.c suggests it's related to the USB OHCI (Open Host Controller Interface) implementation in QEMU. OHCI is a type of USB controller used in emulators.
+
+The function ohci_frame_boundary probably deals with timing or scheduling of USB transactions, maybe how frames are handled in the USB protocol. The backtrace shows that this function was called by timerlist_run_timers, which suggests it's part of QEMU's timer handling mechanism. 
+
+Wait, but what category does this fall under? Let me look at the list again: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Since this is related to USB devices, which are handled as peripherals in QEMU. The OHCI controller emulates a USB host controller, so any issues here would likely be under 'peripherals'.
+
+Alternatively, maybe it's part of the device emulation, but I think 'peripherals' is more specific because USB controllers are considered peripheral devices in this context.
+
+So, the category should be 'peripherals'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an assertion failure in a function related to USB OHCI handling, which falls under peripherals emulation. 
+
+**peripherals**
\ No newline at end of file