diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1441')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1441 | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1441 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1441 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c3e329f0a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/assembly/1441 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned an assertion failure when executing the RISC-V vfncvt.rtz.x.f.w instruction. They provided a detailed description, including steps to reproduce and some code. + +First, looking at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The error occurs in target/riscv/translate.c:211 with a message about ctx->insn_start being NULL. This seems related to the translation of RISC-V instructions into QEMU's internal representation, which is part of the disassembler or instruction decoder. + +Since it's happening during the decoding process, and the error is an assertion failure in translate.c, this points towards issues in how instructions are handled at the assembly level. The problem was introduced by a specific commit, suggesting it might be related to recent changes in the RISC-V translation code. + +The instruction vfncvt.rtz.x.f.w is a vector floating-point conversion instruction. If QEMU's handling of such instructions has a bug in its translation, it could cause this failure. This doesn't directly relate to user-mode mapping (so not mistranslation), but rather how the assembly is being processed into QEMU's internal format. + +Looking at the categories, 'assembly' seems appropriate because it's about lowering assembly code into an intermediate representation or target code. Alternatively, 'other' could be a possibility, but since it's specifically related to instruction decoding and translation, 'assembly' fits better. +</think> + +The issue is in the RISC-V instruction decoder during assembly lowering, so the category is: + +**assembly** \ No newline at end of file |