diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1759338')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1759338 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1759338 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1759338 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..78014cb91 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/device/1759338 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +Looking at the bug report, the user is using `qemu-system-sparc` with an SS-20 ROM. The issue is that QEMU doesn't set the number of processors correctly, so the ROM only sees one CPU even when `-smp 2` is used. They mention that without OpenBIOS, they can't get Solaris to install on the SS-20. + +The problem seems related to how QEMU configures or reports processor information to the emulated hardware. Since it's about setting the number of CPUs in a way the ROM understands, and QEMU is not correctly configuring that, I think this falls under how QEMU handles the emulation of system components. The specific issue is with the CPU configuration during boot. + +The category "device" seems appropriate here because it relates to hardware device emulation—specifically, the processor devices in the emulated machine. Alternatively, it could be under "boot" since the issue arises during the boot process, but the root cause is more about how QEMU configures the system's components rather than the booting itself. + +Wait, but looking at the options again, "hypervisor" isn't one of them... Wait no, the categories listed include hypervisor as a separate category. So maybe it's not that. Alternatively, since it's about processor configuration in the emulated machine, perhaps it's under "device". Or maybe "boot" because it affects what the system sees during boot. + +But considering the core issue is that QEMU isn't setting up the processor count correctly for the ROM to recognize, which is part of the device emulation. Therefore, "device" might be more accurate than "boot". + +Alternatively, could it be "peripherals"? But peripherals usually refer to things like serial ports, disks, etc., not CPUs. + +Hmm, I'm a bit unsure. The key here is that the ROM isn't recognizing multiple processors because QEMU isn't setting up the processor configuration correctly. So this relates to how devices (in this case, CPU devices) are emulated or configured in QEMU. Therefore, "device" seems like the appropriate category. + +But I'm not entirely confident. Let me think again: The user is trying to set -smp 2 but the ROM only sees one processor. This suggests that QEMU isn't correctly informing the emulated hardware about the number of CPUs available. So it's an issue with how QEMU configures the device (CPU) setup, which falls under "device". +</think> + +device \ No newline at end of file |