1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1328996 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1328996
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..abdfbc1f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1328996
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The issue is with AArch64 handling of the 'blr x30' instruction. The user mentions that when using x30 as the operand for blr, the result is incorrect. They also note that according to the ARMv8 manual, there's no restriction on using x30 (LR) with blr, so it should be allowed.
+
+The test cases provided include two executables: 'good' and 'bad'. The 'good' executable uses 'blr x9' and works as expected, printing "func". However, the 'bad' executable, which uses 'blr x30', doesn't print anything. But on the actual device, it does work correctly.
+
+So, the problem lies within QEMU's handling of this specific instruction when using x30. It seems like a translation issue in the emulator where x30 is not being handled properly during the blr operation.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target, which happens in user-mode assembly lowering. This fits because it's about how QEMU translates the 'blr' instruction with x30, which is a register that might have special handling or not be supported correctly in the emulator.
+
+Other categories like device, graphic, socket, network, etc., don't seem to fit here since this is purely an assembly instruction issue. The problem isn't related to hardware devices, networking, or graphical rendering but rather how QEMU processes the instruction at the assembly level.
+</think>
+
+mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file