1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1759333 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1759333
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b61c8a061
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1759333
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user reported an issue where using SSE instructions in a macOS guest with HVF acceleration causes crashes because the emulator treats them as illegal instructions. They also mentioned that looking at x86_decode.c shows SSE emulation isn't implemented yet.
+
+So, the problem is about handling specific CPU instructions (SSE) which aren't being properly emulated by QEMU when using HVF on macOS. This falls under the category related to how instructions are handled during translation or execution in the emulator.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation refers to incorrect mapping from source to target, but this seems more about missing functionality rather than a wrong mapping. Other options like assembly lowering (assembly) might be relevant since it's about translating x86 instructions.
+
+However, the issue is specifically with SSE instructions not being supported in the emulator, which points more towards an incomplete implementation of instruction handling. Therefore, 'mistranslation' doesn't quite fit here because it's not a translation error but rather missing features for certain instructions.
+
+Wait, another thought: HVF is related to hardware-assisted virtualization. Maybe this connects to KVM or hypervisor functions? But the problem arises in the x86 emulator part of QEMU, so it's more about the instruction decoding and handling within the emulator itself.
+
+So, perhaps 'mistranslation' isn't the best fit. It might fall under 'assembly' since it's about how instructions are being processed or translated incorrectly, leading to crashes. Alternatively, since SSE is a specific CPU feature, maybe it's under 'peripherals', but that doesn't seem right either.
+
+Wait, looking again at the categories: 'other' is an option for things not fitting into other explicit categories. But considering the bug is about handling of x86 instructions in the emulator, specifically missing support for SSE with HVF, which is a decoding issue, I think it's more aligned with 'mistranslation' because it's related to how the source (x86) instructions are being translated into the target (emulated) environment. Alternatively, it could be seen as an assembly lowering problem since it's about converting x86 instructions to the emulator's IR.
+
+But in this case, since the issue is that SSE instructions aren't handled at all, leading to them being treated as illegal, it might not be a mistranslation but rather missing translation code. So perhaps 'mistranslation' is still the closest fit because it's about the incorrect handling during translation. Alternatively, maybe 'assembly' would cover the decoding process.
+
+Hmm. I'm a bit torn between 'mistranslation' and 'other'. Since the issue stems from the lack of implementation in x86_decode.c for SSE instructions under HVF, it might be more accurately categorized as an 'assembly' problem because it's about how assembly instructions are being lowered or decoded.
+
+Wait, no. The category 'assembly' is specifically for lowering to assembly code, but this bug is about decoding and handling of instructions during emulation. So perhaps the closest category is 'mistranslation', which would cover incorrect mapping from source (x86) to target (emulated) architecture, leading to treating valid SSE instructions as invalid.
+
+Alternatively, if none of the categories precisely fit except 'other', but I think 'mistranslation' is more appropriate because it's about how the instructions are being handled during translation.
+</think>
+
+mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file