diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1805445')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1805445 | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1805445 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1805445 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f29a4988d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1805445 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let's break down the information given. + +The user is running a QEMU arm virtual machine with a specific setup: using the palmetto-bmc platform, which supports ARM926EJ-S and SPI Flash. They're using ThreadX as the OS from a phone's firmware (Spreadtrum platform). The command line shows they're using GDB for debugging over TCP. + +The issue arises when running code step-by-step in IDA. Specifically, when executing the instruction `STR R11, [R10]`, instead of storing R11 at the address pointed by R10, it jumps to `STMFD SP!, {R0-R12,LR}` at another address (000328DC). This causes the VM to stop executing new instructions. + +From this, I gather that there's an unexpected jump or misbehavior in the instruction execution flow. The problem seems related to how QEMU is handling certain ARM instructions during debugging, possibly causing an exception or incorrect state transition. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc. Since the issue involves an incorrect command being executed (STMFD instead of STR), it suggests a problem in how QEMU translates or executes ARM instructions, which falls under 'mistranslation'. This category typically refers to issues where source architecture instructions are incorrectly mapped during translation to the target (in this case, QEMU's IR or the host machine). + +Additionally, the user mentions debugging with GDB and IDA, but the main problem is the incorrect execution flow due to an instruction being replaced by another. So 'mistranslation' seems appropriate because it's about how instructions are handled during translation. + +I don't think it's 'debug' category since the issue isn't directly about the debugging tools themselves but rather the behavior of the emulated machine during execution. It's also not 'assembly lowering' as that would be more about optimization steps in compiling, which doesn't seem to apply here. + +Therefore, the most fitting category is 'mistranslation'. +</think> + +mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |