1 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1831362 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1831362
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..759447ff3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1831362
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue with European keyboards specifically mentioning a PC-105 keyboard layout. They're experiencing problems where certain keys aren't working as expected—they call them deadkeys. The affected characters are '<', '>', and '\'. These issues occur when using different Belgian keyboards (USB ones from Logitech and HP, plus the laptop's own keyboard).
+
+They tried using sendkey commands in the monitor:
+- "sendkey <" resulted in "\"
+- "sendkey shift-<" gave "|"
+- "sendkey ctrl-alt-<" did nothing.
+
+The user also mentioned that GRUB command mode on ArchLinux showed a mix of azerty and qwerty mappings, with letters correct but numbers and special chars not working. They noted that VirtualBox handles the keys properly and provided output from showkey which shows the correct keycodes being pressed (86).
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals.
+
+The issue seems related to how QEMU handles keyboard input. Since it's about key mappings and specific keyboard behaviors, I'm thinking it might be a translation problem between the host and target architectures. But since they're using Windows 10 as the host, perhaps it's more about how QEMU processes the keyboard events.
+
+Alternatively, this could fall under 'device' because it's related to input devices (keyboards) not functioning correctly within the virtual machine. The keycodes are being handled improperly, which suggests a device-level issue.
+
+Wait, but in QEMU terms, handling of keys is often part of the Input Layer Translation, which might be under 'mistranslation' if there's an incorrect mapping from the host to target. However, since it's about specific keyboard layouts and key presses not translating as expected, maybe 'mistranslation' isn't quite right.
+
+Looking again, the user is on Windows 10, so perhaps QEMU's handling of USB devices or input events under Windows is flawed. This might relate more to how devices are handled in the hypervisor context. Alternatively, since it's about keyboard mappings within the VM, it could be a 'device' issue.
+
+But considering that the user mentions using sendkey commands and incorrect key outputs, this points towards an issue with how QEMU translates or remaps keys internally. So maybe it's more related to the input processing rather than device handling. However, the categories don't have 'input' explicitly, so perhaps 'mistranslation' is still a possibility.
+
+Alternatively, since the problem is about key mappings not working correctly across different keyboards and QEMU sessions, it might be classified under 'other', but I think more specific would be better.
+
+Wait, another angle: in the GRUB command mode, they see mixed keyboard layouts. This suggests that the boot process or how the VM handles the initial keyboard setup is flawed, which could point towards a kernel or hypervisor issue. But I'm not entirely sure.
+
+Alternatively, considering that this affects multiple keyboards and QEMU's processing of key events, it might be better categorized under 'device' because it's about the interaction with input devices (keyboards) in the VM environment.
+
+Hmm, but the user mentioned that using sendkey commands resulted in unexpected characters, which suggests an issue with how keys are being translated or mapped when sent to the VM. That points more towards a translation problem, hence 'mistranslation'.
+
+But wait, looking at the possible categories again, there's no specific 'input' category. The closest might be 'device', but I'm not entirely certain. Alternatively, since it's about key mapping issues within the VM, perhaps 'mistranslation' is appropriate.
+
+Wait, the bug report mentions that in GRUB command mode, the keyboard seems to mix azerty and qwerty mappings. This suggests a problem with how the keyboard layout is being handled at the kernel level or during the boot process within the VM. That could point towards 'kernel' as the category.
+
+But I'm not entirely sure. Another angle: if it's about how QEMU translates host keys to target keys, that would be 'mistranslation'. But in this case, the issue is more about the keyboard layout configuration and key presses not being recognized correctly, which might be a device or kernel issue.
+
+I think I need to make an educated guess here. Since it's related to how keyboard input is processed within the VM, particularly with specific keys not working as expected across multiple keyboards, and considering that QEMU handles device emulation, this might fall under 'device'. But if it's about incorrect mapping of keys from host to target, then 'mistranslation' would be more accurate.
+
+Wait, the user mentioned using sendkey commands which didn't produce the expected results. Sendkey is part of the monitor and affects how QEMU injects key events into the VM. So this could indicate a problem with how QEMU translates these keys, hence pointing towards 'mistranslation'.
+
+But in the categories provided, 'mistranslation' isn't explicitly listed except as one of the options. Wait, no—the possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals.
+
+So 'mistranslation' is a category option. Therefore, given that the issue relates to incorrect key mappings when using sendkey and in the VM's keyboard handling, I think it would be classified under 'mistranslation'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes issues with specific keys on European keyboards not functioning correctly within QEMU. The user experiences deadkeys for '<', '>', and '\', which suggests an issue with how these key presses are translated or handled by QEMU. Since sendkey commands result in unexpected characters, it points to a problem in the translation layer between the input and the target environment. Therefore, the category is:
+
+mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file