diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1833668')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1833668 | 30 |
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1833668 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1833668 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..73aa64a07 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1833668 @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's look at the details provided. + +The user is trying to run an ARM binary on Aarch64 using QEMU. They downloaded a Debian package called busybox-static_1.30.1-4_armel.deb and extracted the binary, which they checked with 'file' command. It shows that it's a 32-bit ARM executable. + +When they tried running it with 'qemu-aarch64 busybox.armel', they got an error saying "Invalid ELF image for this architecture". Then they tried specifying the CPU model as 'cortex-a7', but QEMU couldn't find that CPU model, resulting in another error. + +They also mentioned that when looking into the code using GDB, the aarch64_cpus array has some CPUs listed, but arm_cpus is empty. This suggests that there's an issue with how QEMU handles ARM vs Aarch64 binaries, specifically when trying to run 32-bit ARM binaries on Aarch64. + +Looking at the possible categories: The main issue here seems to be related to CPU models and architecture support. Since they're trying to run a 32-bit ARM binary on Aarch64, which requires QEMU to emulate the correct CPU. However, it looks like the arm_cpus array is empty, meaning QEMU doesn't have any ARM CPU models configured for this scenario. + +The categories include 'mistranslation', 'assembly', and others. Mistranslation refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target, which could be relevant here because QEMU isn't handling the translation correctly—since it's not recognizing the necessary CPU models. + +Another possibility is that this might fall under 'device' or 'CPU model' issues, but since the user mentioned the empty arm_cpus array, which is part of how QEMU handles different architectures, it points more towards a problem in the architecture translation process rather than device-related. + +I think 'mistranslation' is the most fitting category here because it's about incorrect handling of the source (ARM) to target (Aarch64) architecture. Alternatively, if there's no specific entry for CPU model configuration issues, maybe 'other', but given the options, mistranslation seems appropriate. +</think> + +The bug report indicates an issue with running 32-bit ARM binaries on Aarch64 using QEMU. The problem arises because QEMU doesn't recognize the required CPU models and fails to correctly translate the architecture, leading to errors when trying to execute the binary. + +**Step-by-Step Explanation:** + +1. **Bug Symptom:** When attempting to run an ARM binary with `qemu-aarch64`, it results in an "Invalid ELF image for this architecture" error. +2. **Investigation:** The user found that the `arm_cpus` array is empty, meaning no ARM CPU models are available for emulation on Aarch64. +3. **Root Cause:** QEMU fails to properly handle 32-bit ARM binaries on Aarch64 due to missing or incorrectly configured CPU models. +4. **Classification:** This issue relates to incorrect handling of the source architecture (ARM) during translation to the target (Aarch64), fitting under 'mistranslation'. + +**Answer:** + +The bug is classified under 'mistranslation'. \ No newline at end of file |