diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1858461')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1858461 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1858461 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1858461 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..72ec3cde7 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1858461 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem again carefully. + +The user is working with QEMU on test images and has added a new syscall (number 436) but receives an ENOSYS error from the MIPS application. They modified the cpu_loop.c file in the mips directory by adding MIPS_SYS(sys_getdents64_x32, 3) to mips_syscall_args. However, when they run it, the code checks if the syscall_num is greater than or equal to the size of mips_syscall_args and returns -TARGET_ENOSYS. + +They noticed that the MIPS cpu_loop.c file looks different from the ARM version, which has its own NR_BASE and other structures. The user is asking for help to refactor the MIPS CPU loop similarly to how it's done in ARM. + +So, what does this have to do with the categories provided? Let me look at the possible categories again: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like other. + +The user is dealing with syscalls in QEMU's MIPS emulation. The problem seems to be about correctly handling system calls in the user-mode translation layer of QEMU. They added a new syscall but it's not recognized, leading to ENOSYS. The issue might be how syscalls are mapped or handled in the code. + +The request is about refactoring the CPU loop to match ARM's structure, which suggests that there's an issue with how MIPS system calls are being processed or translated. This likely relates to incorrect mapping from the source (MIPS) architecture to the target (Linux user-space), which would fall under 'mistranslation'. + +Alternatively, it could be related to assembly lowering if the problem is in how the syscall instructions are generated, but I think mistranslation is more fitting because it's about system call handling and mapping. + +Other possibilities like kernel or hypervisor seem less likely here since this is user-mode code. So I'm leaning towards 'mistranslation'. +</think> + +The issue revolves around correctly handling a new system call in the MIPS emulation within QEMU, specifically related to how syscalls are mapped or processed, pointing to incorrect semantic mapping. + +**Answer:** mistranslation \ No newline at end of file |