1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1884719 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1884719
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4b4b63cfb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1884719
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the report carefully and figure out what's going on.
+
+The user is encountering a "Function not implemented" error when using the Linux libaio library in a foreign architecture like aarch64. They're using Docker with QEMU, specifically the multiarch/qemu-user-static setup for emulation. The issue arises when compiling a program that uses libaio functions like io_queue_init.
+
+From their steps, when they run this on an x86_64 machine or in a Docker container with x86_64 architecture, it works fine and returns res=0. However, when the same code is run in an arm64v8 container using QEMU's user mode emulation, they get ENOSYS (error -38), which means the function isn't implemented.
+
+They tried strace but ran into similar issues where ptrace functions aren't implemented either. They've already tried troubleshooting by using --privileged and disabling seccomp/apparmor, which fixed some permission issues but not the function implementation problem.
+
+So, the core issue is that certain syscalls or functions related to libaio are not being properly emulated in QEMU for aarch64 when running under user mode. This points towards an incomplete or missing implementation of specific system calls in the QEMU codebase when targeting aarch64 as the guest architecture.
+
+Looking at the categories provided, "mistranslation" refers to incorrect semantic mapping from source to target architecture, which could be relevant if certain functions aren't correctly translated for aarch64. However, the user is experiencing this within Docker using QEMU's user mode static binaries, which might involve some form of assembly translation or syscall handling.
+
+Another possible category is "assembly": since it's an issue with function calls not being implemented, maybe there's a missing or incorrect assembly implementation in QEMU for these syscalls on aarch64. Alternatively, it could be related to how the hypervisor (QEMU) handles certain operations, but I'm not sure if that's the primary category here.
+
+But considering that libaio relies on specific syscalls and their handling within the emulation environment, the most fitting category might be "mistranslation" because the functions are not being correctly translated or emulated for the target architecture. Alternatively, it could fall under "device" or "network" if it's related to I/O operations, but libaio is more about asynchronous I/O which isn't directly tied to a specific device.
+
+Wait, another angle: when using user-mode QEMU (qemu-user-static), all system calls are translated on the fly. If certain syscalls required by libaio aren't implemented in the QEMU's user-mode translation for aarch64, that would cause these ENOSYS errors. So it's about the translation layer not handling those functions correctly.
+
+So the problem is likely due to missing or incorrect translations of system calls needed by libaio on aarch64 when running under user-mode QEMU. This fits into "mistranslation" as it's about how source (host) functions are mapped to target (guest) functions in the emulation environment.
+
+Another thought: sometimes, certain syscalls might not be implemented for specific architectures in QEMU. For example, if aarch64 isn't fully supported in user-mode for these particular syscalls. But again, this would fall under mistranslation because it's about mapping correctly between host and guest.
+
+So, after considering all this, the category that best fits is "mistranslation".
+</think>
+
+mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file