1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1893667 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1893667
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..15c0c1198
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/mistranslation/1893667
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's break down how I would classify this bug report. The issue is that when using cross-arch builds with mock and qemu-user-static, Btrfs commands aren't working correctly because the necessary ioctl calls aren't being emulated. 
+
+First, the problem occurs in user-space emulation, so it's related to how QEMU handles different architectures at the user level. Since Btrfs uses specific ioctl operations that aren't supported in the user-space version of QEMU, this points to a missing implementation in the translation or handling of those syscalls.
+
+Looking at the categories provided, "mistranslation" seems appropriate because it's about how the source architecture's calls are being mapped (or not) correctly in the target environment. The issue isn't with assembly lowering or performance but rather with the lack of support for specific ioctl operations needed by Btrfs commands. 
+
+Other categories like 'device' or 'network' don't fit because the problem is specifically about filesystem operations, not hardware devices or network issues. It's also not a kernel or hypervisor bug per se, as it's an omission in the user-space emulation layer.
+
+So, the correct category should be "mistranslation" since it's about the incorrect handling of Btrfs commands' semantics during cross-arch emulation.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to missing support for Btrfs ioctls in QEMU-user-static, which affects the semantic mapping when emulating other architectures. This falls under incorrect translation or handling of system calls needed for Btrfs operations.
+
+Answer: mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file